Notices
West Region Includes AZ, CA, HI, NV, UT.

Utah Evos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 07:07 AM
  #9451  
STOMPER!'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
You are kidding, right? This was a stock turbo, correct? And you are trying to say it would make 475 WHP on a dynojet??? Please explain how a 44 pound/min turbo is going to do that.

Not trying to stir up ****, but the car made 342.5 WHP. Look at the "POWER" value, not the "Powcorr." Look at the P/Pc...1.158 It's called a correction factor...

342 WHP on a stock turbo and 91 octane is nothing to be disappointed with. 400 is unrealistic. Go do some searching, you'll find that a well tuned, heavily modded stock turbo Evo at sea level will be pushing it to make 370 WHP on 93 octane. I'm talking Ivey tuning and a hard core stock turbo setup here. Yet you beat it by 20 WHP at 4200' with probably half the mods and you aren't interested in why you made more power?
It is not just 91 octane buddy it has alky injection and pleny of mods thanks drive thru.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #9452  
eficker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Provo
Originally Posted by Evolution IVGSR
Hi my name is Dallin I am the guy with the EVO 4. I am rebuilding my motor and will be done by the end of the month. I think that there should be a BBQ and dyno day some time next month. I will need a good Tune and dyno soon. also I am going to do pistons and rods and would like to know what you guys would do and what compression? I have been told wiseco or JE pistons and crower rods. what would you do?
I would steer clear of wiseco. Fwiw. Have you been searching around in the motor section? There are probably a lot more peeps in there running built motors than in here. Who's building your motor?

Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
You are kidding, right? This was a stock turbo, correct? And you are trying to say it would make 475 WHP on a dynojet??? Please explain how a 44 pound/min turbo is going to do that.

Not trying to stir up ****, but the car made 342.5 WHP. Look at the "POWER" value, not the "Powcorr." Look at the P/Pc...1.158 It's called a correction factor...

342 WHP on a stock turbo and 91 octane is nothing to be disappointed with. 400 is unrealistic. Go do some searching, you'll find that a well tuned, heavily modded stock turbo Evo at sea level will be pushing it to make 370 WHP on 93 octane. I'm talking Ivey tuning and a hard core stock turbo setup here. Yet you beat it by 20 WHP at 4200' with probably half the mods and you aren't interested in why you made more power?
Whoa, man, <nachoLibre>Take it eassay</nachoLibre>.

Okay, so 20% is probly a little high. I don't think that 10% is a stretch though. Dynojets are notoriously high reading, since their method of measure is so inaccurate. Most dynos (that are realistic) measure torque (which is a valid measure of energy) where the dynojet just takes a set formula and measures how long it takes to spin their giant drum up to a certain speed. The torque number on a dynojet is derived from the horsepower number. This is opposite to the way it should be done. This is also the reason why the newer dynojets have gone away from this method and have now gone similar to a mustag dyno (more reliable and accurate results).

The Dynapack Dyno uses hydraulic pumps to measure the amount of energy (torque) that is being created at the wheels. This is much more accurate. The horsepower number (which we all know is a function of torque and RPM is then calculated from that figure.

Stomper's car is far from stock. The turbo is stock, yes, but that is about it. But even though the motor is built now, it made 390 when it was stock. We know the reason he didn't make more power was due to the turbo.

Perhaps you should read up on alky injection and its effects on octane (effective octane), iat's, and the ability to run more boost and timing (due to increased effective octane).

The uncorrected number is an accurate description of what power he is actually making at this altitude. That is the most accurate number. But to compare with guys at sea level and elsewhere, the corrected number is accepted as the horsepower of the car, since anything from a low-pressure to high-pressure, temperature and humidity can have significant effects on the uncorrected number. Do you think that the CA guys are posting uncorrected numbers? You should see all the sensors and probes the Dynapack has on it...lol.

I'm not trying to be condescending, or hate or anything like that, just trying to explain and answer the questions that you posed in your post. I welcome any comments or questions.

Last edited by eficker; Feb 8, 2007 at 08:06 AM.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #9453  
DarksideGTI's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
I think Mikes point was that the stock turbo can flow a max rate of 44 lbs/minute. Whatever octane you are running doesn't change that fact.lbx/min flow rate

I may be wrong but I believe a 44lb/min turbo will max out at about 410BHP.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #9454  
eficker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Provo
Originally Posted by DarksideGTI
I think Mikes point was that the stock turbo can flow a max rate of 44 lbs/minute. Whatever octane you are running doesn't change that fact.lbx/min flow rate

I may be wrong but I believe a 44lb/min turbo will max out at about 410BHP.
That fact that any turbo will "max out" on horsepower is ridiculous. Some motors are more effecient than others, some run methanol, some alcohol. There is no "perfect environment" for a turbo to produce a "max power" or any power for that matter.

The manufacturer's estimate on where a turbo will make what power is just a guess. And a quite subjective guess at that.

Their flow maps are very accurate, but notice that they do not show horsepower numbers on any of those charts. It is all subjective "guessing."
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #9455  
jcnel_evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: ...
Hopefully this contributes to the discussion at hand as horsepower discussions get quickly out of hand.

Da Basics:

Torque = Twisting --> Force <--
Horsepower = rpm x Torque x (a bunch of constants)

I always like to think of the torque (the force) pushing me down the road, and like to think of the horsepower as the amount of energy going into the system in order to keep my motor rotating at some rpm with some torque behind it.

Otherwise dyno readings start to get very confusing and "correction" factors start to take priority over other things.

Perhaps I'm going to have to start to ask eficker about "subjectiveness" but most of his arguments warrant technical merit.

So now the real question of the day is I'm coming to a point where I need to start upgrading the EVO. How far can I go on cams and turbos before I start to get ousted from certain SCCA classes? If I go with a set of 272s will I need to pop in head bolts, springs and retainers? The car is going to be receiving a bit of coil over jewelery (girls suck they don't need jewelery) which may already put me in another classification. Thoughts?

Cheers,

~j.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #9456  
bullfrg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by jcnel_evo8
So now the real question of the day is I'm coming to a point where I need to start upgrading the EVO. How far can I go on cams and turbos before I start to get ousted from certain SCCA classes? If I go with a set of 272s will I need to pop in head bolts, springs and retainers? The car is going to be receiving a bit of coil over jewelery (girls suck they don't need jewelery) which may already put me in another classification. Thoughts?
Cams or turbo upgrades will put you in Street Mod. This is a very competitive class and one where money put into your car counts, especially if you want to win. It is a fun class though, and allows a lot of mods.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #9457  
Evolution IVGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 1
From: Utah, SLC
My Dad and I are building it. We are going to do a little head work and the pistons and rods. New cams an intake manifold, turbo manifold, full exhaust, and maybe a few fuel up grades. New front mount and piping too. Then we will go from there.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 02:19 PM
  #9458  
evobeatsti's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
hey everyone i am planning on hosting a track day for charity before the summer comes and would like to see if anyone would be available to do this. i was looking at 100-125 for a half day and 200-225 for a full day let me know what you think, you would also get a tax writeoff if you participated! pm me if you can do this and i will see if it is feasable
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #9459  
VIIImylunch's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: utah
I am up for it.

What charity are you doing this for.

hey guys i am looking for wing for my s2k. here is what i am thinking.




Last edited by VIIImylunch; Feb 8, 2007 at 05:00 PM.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #9460  
evobeatsti's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
i am still looking into charity's but it will most certainly have something to do with driving such as a charity against drunk driving or something along those lines. as of right now i am just seeing if their are enough people interested to make this feasable so i am expecting this event to happen in may if at all. thanks for your interest and keep it coming.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #9461  
Evolution IVGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 1
From: Utah, SLC
I see that Eclipse all the time on State. That thing is so HOT!!! JK. I dont know what makes people think that, things like that look good.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #9462  
emolution's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Fl
Originally Posted by VIIImylunch
I am up for it.

THAT WING IS SICKKKKKKKK! im going with that same exact setup but ontop of my wing.... that makes 3WINGS!!!! ill have the most downforce ever! and ill get all the babes!

p.s. hows the weather in utah? its hot here
cant wait to go there late march for a little snowboarding!!!
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #9463  
dtcevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: MMP, Lehi and My Shop
Originally Posted by evobeatsti
hey everyone i am planning on hosting a track day for charity before the summer comes and would like to see if anyone would be available to do this. i was looking at 100-125 for a half day and 200-225 for a full day let me know what you think, you would also get a tax writeoff if you participated! pm me if you can do this and i will see if it is feasable
i'm in. i'm sure you'll find plenty of people to sign up for open track days here.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #9464  
jcnel_evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: ...
I really think you need to experience the ultimate in wing technology. Paper Mache.



~j.
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #9465  
silverofs's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: s.l.c ut
Originally Posted by eficker
That fact that any turbo will "max out" on horsepower is ridiculous. Some motors are more effecient than others, some run methanol, some alcohol. There is no "perfect environment" for a turbo to produce a "max power" or any power for that matter.

The manufacturer's estimate on where a turbo will make what power is just a guess. And a quite subjective guess at that.

Their flow maps are very accurate, but notice that they do not show horsepower numbers on any of those charts. It is all subjective "guessing."
please tell me how a turbo flows more then it is rated for???? to make more hp that is..... i made almost 470whp corrected which is @ sea level so all mike is trying to say is i really make lower 400's up here @ this elevation which judging by my trap speeds last year = true 3200lbs & 470hp=121.45 traps (not wheel hp)crank hp
http://www.wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:30 AM.