Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Car and Driver Comparo is out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #391  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by C2Rally
Read the way read the whole post amby! Again someone getting over zealous and jumping to conclusions about the SST, try the MAF sensor! quoting post #20

By the way I just heard the new wrx's only put down 150hp on a dyno! it must be true since I posted in a forum no?

It's amazing what people will believe.
Provide facts. I'm sorry but you're just coming off as crazy now. The WRX puts down ridiculous 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times thus making your statement obviously wrong. The Ralliart does not post amazing times thus making the rated 237 HP likely. I highly suggest you do more research.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #392  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by boondoc
Ok hold on Amby. If u got beef with the numbers talk to XS Engineering and Dynamic Dynos. I understand ur point but I did say this might not be ur almighty 'Real World' dyno but it was outside, for all we know it could've been 40 degrees outside but these are the numbers they got.
You yourself have to agree that the numbers are ridiculously high, Evos don't dyno that high.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #393  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by heavyD
Well Amby since you think a single person having an issue (not failure by the way) is a big deal I will offer something a bit more substantial for you. Another 2009 WRX bites the dust. This IS past the sign of things to come as double digit 2009 failures is nothing to dismiss.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...487482&page=21

Even a video of the issue on a 2009 for your pleasure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvxaR7HSmWc

Cue the excuses lol.
Here's the difference, the issues with the WRX are known to Subaru and they have taken the actions necessary to rectify them (ie. they've stopped using the process that lead to the failures in the first place). The problem doesn't lie with the car itself but rather some parts that were made incorrectly. If the TC-SST has issues like overheating, it's an inherent design flaw.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #394  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by EsRt2evo
HAHA turned out to be a MAF sensor. Nice try anyway.
What I find odd is how a problematic MAF sensor can lead to the transmission acting the way it did. Clearly the transmission is quite closely connected with the rest of the car. How will this affect tuning?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #395  
Deetz00's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Mitsu has no business charging what they due for the RA, they've managed to price themselves right out of contention. You know you're in trouble when your getting trampled by a fwd cobalt! Its embarrassing.

They've structured their car's so terribly that its aggravating for the consumer to find a package that suits them. In canada the ralliart option list consists of a $5000 leather, recaro, stereo, etc. package or nothing at all. It is ridiculous to have such an all or nothing approach. I'm glad I didn't get the RA because I have a feeling that the '10/'11 models are going to be much more desirable and those who couldn't wait are going to have some regrets. In fact if the subi wasn't so bloody ugly they would gotten my $$$ already.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #396  
boondoc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Inbetween Miami and Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by ambystom01
You yourself have to agree that the numbers are ridiculously high, Evos don't dyno that high.
Evo's and STi's do dyno higher on that specific dyno. Now on the Mustang Dyno (which is the "real world" dyno u love) it would dyno lower.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #397  
Turbodemon's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: PLANO ILL
great thread.
the 09 wrx is > ra for the money imo
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #398  
heavyD's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Here's the difference, the issues with the WRX are known to Subaru and they have taken the actions necessary to rectify them (ie. they've stopped using the process that lead to the failures in the first place). The problem doesn't lie with the car itself but rather some parts that were made incorrectly. If the TC-SST has issues like overheating, it's an inherent design flaw.
But 2009 WRX's are failing so the actions taken for 2008's haven't fixed the matter. It's a fast car but the engines are junk so I guess if you are a gambler the WRX is for you but if you want something reliable look elsewhere.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #399  
dboz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by heavyD
But 2009 WRX's are failing so the actions taken for 2008's haven't fixed the matter. It's a fast car but the engines are junk so I guess if you are a gambler the WRX is for you but if you want something reliable look elsewhere.
Toyota and Honda?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #400  
C2Rally's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Likes: 1
From: Kelowna, CANADA
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Provide facts. I'm sorry but you're just coming off as crazy now. The WRX puts down ridiculous 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times thus making your statement obviously wrong. The Ralliart does not post amazing times thus making the rated 237 HP likely. I highly suggest you do more research.
Amby Your totally missing the point! I was not being serious! mearly poking fun at you which you didnt' even get. The wrx obvious has more than 150 but Everyone seems to have to explain things to you as you continually run away with peoples words and turn things around to make sense only to you! Stop being a b***h. go hassle the nerds on the wrx forms or do you already do that too?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #401  
boondoc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Inbetween Miami and Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by dboz
Toyota and Honda?
If thats ur cup of tea sure
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #402  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by boondoc
Evo's and STi's do dyno higher on that specific dyno. Now on the Mustang Dyno (which is the "real world" dyno u love) it would dyno lower.
But what do they dyno? Do they dyno 290 HP? Do they dyno 270 HP?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #403  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by C2Rally
Amby Your totally missing the point! I was not being serious! mearly poking fun at you which you didnt' even get. The wrx obvious has more than 150 but Everyone seems to have to explain things to you as you continually run away with peoples words and turn things around to make sense only to you! Stop being a b***h. go hassle the nerds on the wrx forms or do you already do that too?
I understood you were joking, I was pointing how absurd your argument was getting. As for the rest, I've been here 5 years, why would I leave now?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #404  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by heavyD
But 2009 WRX's are failing so the actions taken for 2008's haven't fixed the matter. It's a fast car but the engines are junk so I guess if you are a gambler the WRX is for you but if you want something reliable look elsewhere.
How is it a gamble? The number of motors having issues isn't huge, they've stopped using the production methods that caused the problems in the first place and Subaru is clearly covering all affected motors.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #405  
heavyD's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by ambystom01
How is it a gamble? The number of motors having issues isn't huge, they've stopped using the production methods that caused the problems in the first place and Subaru is clearly covering all affected motors.
Why are 09's failing then? Sure Subaru is replacing the shortblocks and sometimes the whole engine but who wants to go through that on a new car? I know a couple of local people already that were looking at 09 WRX's but moved on (one just ordered a Ralliart instead) because the word is getting out that 09's have the ongoing problem.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 PM.