Notices
ECU Flash

ECUFlash / Evoscan / Mitsulogger Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 05:21 AM
  #1171  
evoscan's Avatar
Silver Sponsor
15 Year Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 886
Likes: 21
From: nz
The above I presume you are referring to Evo9. Because MUT07, MUT3A, MUT12, MUT3E, MUT4A are all valid for pre 1996 Mitsubishi vehicles.

If Load Calculated is deleted, what would users use instead to get the full range of Load values for say a 1996 Evo4?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 04:13 AM
  #1172  
HaVoC187's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
Originally Posted by evoscan
UeGO works with EvoScan v2.9 use that.

Also EvoScan v2.5 is available for download on this webpage: http://www.evoscan.com/evoscan-updates
For those of you having problems getting your UEGO to log, I can verify evoscan v2.9.0017 works
Thanks for the tip evoscan.

Now I still have another issue to fix. I can't get Load 1Byte to log.
Request ID in evoscan is 41 so I opened ecuflash, opened my rom, went to the MUT table and changed the value in MUT41 to 0x840B.
I then flashed my ecu with the modified rom and tried logging but it doesn't work, just says 0 all the time.
Is there anything else I need to do?
I'm on rom 88840016.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 07:55 AM
  #1173  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by evoscan
The above I presume you are referring to Evo9. Because MUT07, MUT3A, MUT12, MUT3E, MUT4A are all valid for pre 1996 Mitsubishi vehicles.

If Load Calculated is deleted, what would users use instead to get the full range of Load values for say a 1996 Evo4?
If those are valid for pre-1996 then perhaps rename the entries or create a separaste xml file? Hasn't anyone figured out a 2-byte load address for these ROMs? Or is there no 2-byte load?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 05:12 AM
  #1174  
marcusE's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Originally Posted by Macaroni
I get the same thing. Mine always says "No response from vehicle ECU". +1 for any advice on fixing this

I tried checking any DTC's with mine since my CEL light is burned out and I got

CHECK DTC's Complete. In the DTC box it says "No response from vehicle ecu" does that = no codes?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 06:52 AM
  #1175  
HaVoC187's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
Anyone can help me out?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #1176  
AndyCT9W's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by marcusE
I tried checking any DTC's with mine since my CEL light is burned out and I got

CHECK DTC's Complete. In the DTC box it says "No response from vehicle ecu" does that = no codes?
No, it will say scan complete and the quantity of DTCs found. Try starting evoscan, connecting the cable to the vehicle then switching the key to the on position, with a 10 sec gap between each step then checking for DTCs. Sometimes it has hard time connecting, I know mine does most times.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 09:25 AM
  #1177  
PrimerSdime's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, MD
I play hell reading dtc's through evoscan.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #1178  
Kakihara's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 2
From: Europe
evo 9-open port 1.3

I never had any problems logging with evoscan from 2.5 to 2.8 but since switching to 2.9 I have this : "Object reference not set to an instance of an object"

Is it because I re-arranged the lines so I have those I use the most on top ?
It doesn't seem to do this all the time, I'm pretty sure it's one or several values that when logged cause this. I tried logging the bare minimum rpm,tp,adv,airflow,afrmap,afr,knocksum and had no errors.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 02:04 AM
  #1179  
evoscan's Avatar
Silver Sponsor
15 Year Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 886
Likes: 21
From: nz
Originally Posted by Kakihara
"Object reference not set to an instance of an object"
Is it because I re-arranged the lines so I have those I use the most on top ?
I haven't heard this from anyone else. must be something unique. can you log a support ticket on evoscan website, and write which cable type, baudrate, ecu dropdown you had selected, and which items you had selected.. maybe a screenshot could help .
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 06:12 PM
  #1180  
Zman15's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Kakihara
evo 9-open port 1.3

I never had any problems logging with evoscan from 2.5 to 2.8 but since switching to 2.9 I have this : "Object reference not set to an instance of an object"
Same thing has happened to me. Evo 9 running Tephra 88590715 and using OP2.0 to connect to the ECM. It happens when I log "External Wideband A/F Ratio" and the signal goes lean - basically when I lift off the throttle, my LC-1 goes really lean and times out in a way. At least that what seems to happen in LogWorks. This was never an issue running EvoScan 2.7 on Windows XP, but now I'm running EvoScan 2.9 on Windows 7. I did not run EvoScan 2.7 on my Win7 machine. Also, I don't think I can blame the serial to usb adapter because it does fine when it's in range. Any other ideas?

Thanks in advance.

- Paul
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 01:55 AM
  #1181  
EVO8emUp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 1
From: Wheeling, WV
I've been getting a FTDI read timeout error -4 with Evoscan v2.7.0070. Even with anti-virus disabled while logging.

Using an HP mini 210-1018 CL

I'm stumped.

Also I noticed that it's initializing at 5 baud. Shouldn't it be higher than that?




Last edited by EVO8emUp; Feb 7, 2012 at 07:27 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 09:08 AM
  #1182  
Kakihara's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by evoscan
I haven't heard this from anyone else. must be something unique. can you log a support ticket on evoscan website, and write which cable type, baudrate, ecu dropdown you had selected, and which items you had selected.. maybe a screenshot could help .
thx Ill try to test 1 parameter at a time to hopefully pinpoint the problem and make a screenshot when if/it happens.

Like Zman15, it may be because of my LC-1 WB, I'll try not to log it.

Won't be able to give you an update soon sadly, it's impossible to datalog properly these days, we now have between 15 and -2.2°F outside temp where I live the engine oil temp doesn't go above 158°F and it takes an hour to reach it ><
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 01:40 AM
  #1183  
evoscan's Avatar
Silver Sponsor
15 Year Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 886
Likes: 21
From: nz
2.7.0070? please use EvoScan v2.9.0017
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 04:31 PM
  #1184  
Zman15's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by evoscan
2.7.0070? please use EvoScan v2.9.0017
Hamish,

I am running v2.9.0017.

Any ideas or suggestions for my problem?

Originally Posted by Zman15
Evo 9 running Tephra 88590715 and using OP2.0 to connect to the ECM. It happens when I log "External Wideband A/F Ratio" and the signal goes lean - basically when I lift off the throttle, my LC-1 goes really lean and times out in a way. At least that what seems to happen in LogWorks. This was never an issue running EvoScan 2.7 on Windows XP, but now I'm running EvoScan 2.9 on Windows 7. I did not run EvoScan 2.7 on my Win7 machine. Also, I don't think I can blame the serial to usb adapter because it does fine when it's in range. Any other ideas?
Thanks,

- Paul
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 12:15 AM
  #1185  
marcoEVO9's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: So cal.
i cant log any of my fuel trims, only o2 feed back. Mut table is stock.

Im trying to set latencies and scaling on my 1000cc PTE injectors. I tried the ones on the fuel injector thread with no success.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.