Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:41 AM
  #4216  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
Thanks for singling me out with incorrect information........

Please go back and read my post again. I mentioned the Indy housing as an option to a question a gentleman posted about wanting an EWG option. I am not sure how you garnered from reading my post that is the single answer or did I ever compare it to a twin scroll.........

And good on you for denying actual data in regards to a TS housing vs a Single Scroll in regards to spool and area under the curve.......you are more than welcome to rebuke Physics and deny actual DATA if you so please on your own terms . I mean shoot, the gentleman that responded to your post (which you entirely ignored) had actual data AND dyno graphs to prove the TS actually producing more area under the curve as opposed to the same single scroll option lol! Oh the irony......

Really? Where do you see me denying any data? You were responding to a guy who made a statement about wanting an external gate divided T4 housing. Sorry I didn't get your garbled post, but people (more than just you) were talking about wanting the 7163 in a larger T4 divided housing and/or an external gate T4 divided housing. All I'm saying is that even if BW made such a housing, it would probably perform marginally better than the v-band or divided housings that are currently available.

Last edited by RWD4G63; Aug 2, 2016 at 09:49 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:43 AM
  #4217  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes: 810
From: Portland, Or
Originally Posted by mrfred
None the higher flow pumps available at that time, Aeromotive, DeatchWerks, W400 (non-E85 older) were able to provide any more fuel than a punched W255. This was on an otherwise 100% stock supply system including wiring. The issue is that the restriction from the fuel supply line causes so much additional pressure at the pump that the pressure relief valve in the pump activates. I think the new HP W450 (E85 version) could actually supply more fuel in a drop-in application. However, I think the amp draw would be enough to toast the fuel pump fuse and substantially heat up the factory wiring.
http://realstreetperformance.com/Fue...ison-Test.html

This is the pump data I was looking at when I changed out from the 255 to 340 knowing I'll never go over what I'm already at since power band is critical to me and 300tq @ low rpm. Has this been shown to be wrong or did it come out later than your investigations?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:46 AM
  #4218  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
That is the second synapse I've seen fail like that. Makes me not want to install the one I have.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:59 AM
  #4219  
RalliartRsX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 1
From: Maryland, USA
Originally Posted by RWD4G63
Really? Where do you see me denying any data? You were responding to a guy who made a statement about wanting an external gate divided T4 housing. Sorry I didn't get your garbled post, but people (more than just you) were talking about wanting the 7163 in a larger T4 divided housing and/or an external gate T4 divided housing. All I'm saying is that even if BW made such a housing, it would probably perform marginally better than the v-band or divided housings that are currently available.

More power to you buddy
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 10:10 AM
  #4220  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by RWD4G63
All I'm saying is that even if BW made such a housing, it would probably perform marginally better than the v-band or divided housings that are currently available.
Better is ... wait for it... better.

BW offers a T4 twin scroll EWG for the 7064, 7670, 8374, and 9174. But for some reason decided not to offer it on the 7163

If you are going to drop $5K+ on a turbo kit, why sacrifice anything.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 10:47 AM
  #4221  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
They don't offer it for any B1 frame turbo.

Buy the supercore and the internal gate housing minus canister, weld the gate shut, and run two external gates off the housing. That should reduce emap a bit and get it into the same range as the v-band housing at max effort. You'll also have maximum control of the gates and can use as many-a-port solenoid as you'd like.

I agree that it would be lovely if they offered us a smorgesboard of housing options, but I don't think the 7163 needs them IMHO.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 10:50 AM
  #4222  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Dallas J
http://realstreetperformance.com/Fue...ison-Test.html

This is the pump data I was looking at when I changed out from the 255 to 340 knowing I'll never go over what I'm already at since power band is critical to me and 300tq @ low rpm. Has this been shown to be wrong or did it come out later than your investigations?
No doubt the 340 has higher flow at reasonable pump back pressure levels. Its the combination of high boost (28+ psi) and high flow at peak rpm requirements where all the pumps tend to give the same result because the back pressure on the pumps exceed the relief valve opening pressure. At ~500 whp worth of E85, I was seeing 16 psi of additional pressure at the pump compared to at the rail. Total pressure at the pump was 84 psi. This would be at the 45 psi row in the Real Street table. According to that, the Aeromotive is a clear winner, but my own experiences showed no benefit. In fact, the Aeromotive was the worst. Now this was back in 2011, and maybe Aeromotive made some changes since then. Here are my test results:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ve...mp-wiring.html
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 10:55 AM
  #4223  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
I am not a fan of welding shut the IWG (bye bye warranty).

I am kinda waiting to see if BW brings the quick spool valve housings to market http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=273897

QSV 8374 would be amazing.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 11:02 AM
  #4224  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes: 810
From: Portland, Or
Ahh, good info Mychailo. I know the Aeromotive is now a generation newer and specific to E85 but all I can tell is its mechanically better sealed and more suited to ethanol.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 11:30 AM
  #4225  
Brianawd's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Portland Or
So picked up a walbro 450. Going to put it in today. Then I'm heading back to the dyno
Friday. If need be, I can lower the base fuel pressure to keep the pump happy as
I have way more injector then I need with the 2150s. I know lowing base fuel pressure on e85 works when using large injectors. On my gvr4 I made 562/484 on a single 255 with a rewire and 1600cc injectors.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 12:01 PM
  #4226  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Brianawd
So picked up a walbro 450. Going to put it in today. Then I'm heading back to the dyno
Friday. If need be, I can lower the base fuel pressure to keep the pump happy as
I have way more injector then I need with the 2150s. I know lowing base fuel pressure on e85 works when using large injectors. On my gvr4 I made 562/484 on a single 255 with a rewire and 1600cc injectors.
Did you hardwire the 450 to full-time full voltage?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #4227  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
BW QSV in production is a mythical unicorn. They made one for hype.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 08:15 PM
  #4228  
Brianawd's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Portland Or
Originally Posted by mrfred
Did you hardwire the 450 to full-time full voltage?
I will be doing a rewire on the pump tomorrow using 10ga with a 30amp relay and 20amp fuse. I already have a fuel lab fpr so I don't have to worry about over running the fpr.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 10:16 PM
  #4229  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
BW QSV in production is a mythical unicorn. They made one for hype.
Yup, its not going to happen.

IMO, 2.4L + T4 TS 9174 = perfection
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 11:02 PM
  #4230  
Benja258's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 70
Likes: 1
From: Ashdod
Wish those guys was make some of this for e8-9
http://www.boostresource.com
(Efr bolt on for evo x)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:59 PM.