View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine



152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63



355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny



138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny



109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD



132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo



164
24.01%
Exterior looks



305
44.66%
Interior quality



148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight



79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding



165
24.16%
Price



261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity



133
19.47%
Brakes



163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times



201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll
Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]
You can just cut and paste the image URL into a new browser window. I'm viewing the article right now. 
Hrm,.. kind of a crap article from an author that's obviously spoiled by his over exposure to cars. He calls the VIII a shadow of it's former greatness simply because it isn't greatly improved over the VII, yet he still says it's the best thing this side of a 911 turbo!
Hrm,.. kind of a crap article from an author that's obviously spoiled by his over exposure to cars. He calls the VIII a shadow of it's former greatness simply because it isn't greatly improved over the VII, yet he still says it's the best thing this side of a 911 turbo!
Last edited by Gerlando; Apr 2, 2003 at 08:20 PM.
Maybe this will help folks...
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...34-f34b&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...35-7c0f&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...36-132e&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...37-47f5&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...38-2c06&trans=
Michael
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...34-f34b&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...35-7c0f&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...36-132e&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...37-47f5&trans=
http://members12.clubphoto.com/_cgi-...38-2c06&trans=
Michael
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Leadfoot
[B]Maybe this will help folks...
[
Leadfoot,
Please email me the info as well ... that is if you are still having trouble posting it. Jeff.Lerman@tropicana.com
Thanks!!!
[B]Maybe this will help folks...
[
Leadfoot,
Please email me the info as well ... that is if you are still having trouble posting it. Jeff.Lerman@tropicana.com
Thanks!!!
Originally posted by limey
Why can't we get this posted????
Why can't we get this posted????
Look everybody, that site doesn't allow link ups. So this is what you do: Just right click each of those green things in the first post, and click properties, then copy that URL, and Paste it into your Browser. Do that to each article. That should help you guys out.
I read the article and, well, I am dissapointed with the Evolution VIII
. Maybe it is just the way the article was written, but it is bit slow in a straight line compared to previous Evolutions and even the US spec with less power and torque is susposed to accelerate that fast. I had read of a 0-100km/h of 5 seconds (or very close to it) not 0-96km/h (0-60mph) in 5.2? And when the STI's time is 4.6? I know the STI has more power and more torque but 300bhp vs 276bhp and the Evolution is known to have more the rated, 0.8 sec is a long time and 2 sec to 100mph. Maybe I am just used to the Evolution being the faster car.
Aston
. Maybe it is just the way the article was written, but it is bit slow in a straight line compared to previous Evolutions and even the US spec with less power and torque is susposed to accelerate that fast. I had read of a 0-100km/h of 5 seconds (or very close to it) not 0-96km/h (0-60mph) in 5.2? And when the STI's time is 4.6? I know the STI has more power and more torque but 300bhp vs 276bhp and the Evolution is known to have more the rated, 0.8 sec is a long time and 2 sec to 100mph. Maybe I am just used to the Evolution being the faster car.Aston
Last edited by astondg; Apr 2, 2003 at 08:57 PM.

