Recurring P1235 code...
My apologies, should be more diplomatic, only trying to help.
Good diagnostic techs are few and far between, even with a lot of experience many don't get there ever.
Intermittent problems make it even harder, even for a good tech. That's the Toyota throttle problem. I don't think they've even found that one yet, too intermittent.
It's like Toyota with throttles and Mitsu with your car. Do you think they don't want to fix the problem? The tech is incapable. Find a tech that is capable, how many times do I have to say it?
Ignore what Mitsu says and ask the question, who's the best Mitsu tech in driving range and take it there.
It also might help if you could contact the previous owner and find out exactly what he did.
Good diagnostic techs are few and far between, even with a lot of experience many don't get there ever.
Intermittent problems make it even harder, even for a good tech. That's the Toyota throttle problem. I don't think they've even found that one yet, too intermittent.
It's like Toyota with throttles and Mitsu with your car. Do you think they don't want to fix the problem? The tech is incapable. Find a tech that is capable, how many times do I have to say it?
Ignore what Mitsu says and ask the question, who's the best Mitsu tech in driving range and take it there.
It also might help if you could contact the previous owner and find out exactly what he did.
I've been saying this all along. Going to a different tech and contacting the old owner. But finding out the old owner is going to be very tough (since it's illegal for the dealership to give out his info).
Yeah, I don't think they can give webman any info about the previous owner, but they can certainly call the person and ask what all was done before on the car. I know with just about every one of my cars I traded in, the dealership would call me later about questions on the car for the newer owner.
You might have a problem with CO's Lemon Law due to the following:
The part about notifying the manufacturer with a certified mail letter of the problem. It doesn't specifically state in that paragraph that just taking it in for service qualifies as "notice".
2:
(c) In no event shall a presumption under paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) apply against a manufacturer unless the manufacturer has received prior written notification by certified mail from or on behalf of the consumer and has been provided an opportunity to cure the defect alleged. Such defect shall count as one nonconformity subject to repair under subparagraph (I) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (2).
(c) In no event shall a presumption under paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) apply against a manufacturer unless the manufacturer has received prior written notification by certified mail from or on behalf of the consumer and has been provided an opportunity to cure the defect alleged. Such defect shall count as one nonconformity subject to repair under subparagraph (I) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (2).
The "notice" was the letter that was sent to Mitsubishi back in January. My lawyer sent a letter on my behalf.
Just got a call from the dealership that they have been able to reproduce this problem several times now. They have a new turbo on order and it is being flown in tomorrow.
So, I guess we'll see.
So, I guess we'll see.
Yah I posted pictures of where the boost pill is a few pages back. /shrug... lets throw random parts at the car and see what happens. I'm sorry man. Don't expect that to fix the issue.






