Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]
the sad part is that the damn subaru will weigh 300 lbs less as they said it was gonna be the same weight as the current gen sti. But the evo will be 300 lbs heavier than the current model evo. Thats gonna suck!! Plus, now our engine advantage may be gone too. I hope mitsu makes this new 4b11t as strong as the 4g63.
The 9 DOES look a **** load better.
The 9 DOES look a **** load better.
For me, I'll take the EVO X because it seems like a great car!
The Balance was the flaw that the STI had. The STI may be faster in straight roads and maybe in 2008 but the AWD system and handling of the STI haven't change much so the EVO has a very big advantage.
I’m telling you I have seen most of the Imprezas having trouble on the tracks. But I haven’t seen EVO's having any trouble.
Last month I saw an 480whp EVO 9 beat a 700hp Viper on a circuit track.
The handling make the car the fastest.
I’m telling you I have seen most of the Imprezas having trouble on the tracks. But I haven’t seen EVO's having any trouble.
Last month I saw an 480whp EVO 9 beat a 700hp Viper on a circuit track.
The handling make the car the fastest.
I’m planning on buying and EVO X, I know it’s almost a year away. But the only thing that worries me is the S-AWD control may be to controlling. But hey I know that mitsu
knows that 99% of the owners of an EVO tweak their cars so I hope they don’t make this one impossible to tune.
knows that 99% of the owners of an EVO tweak their cars so I hope they don’t make this one impossible to tune.
Both cars will most likely have mod hurdles to overcome. The Subie's engine is the Legacy motor which uses a lot of tricks to make it cheaper to produce and harder/more expensive to mod according to SCC.
The legacy motor is the virtually the same motor out of the STi, the only reason why its "harder/more expensive to mod according to SCC" is the ecu/SI drive. Hopefully once that is cracked the cost will come down.
Motor trend said 0-60 in 4.5, BUT 1/4 mi in 12.5.
With 5 manual VIII, IX 0 - 60 times need to be like 4.0 to get a 12.5 1/4 mile.
I can't make my mind, not sure how much WTQ the new tranny will take but with tuning and W/M the X should be good for mid 11's, even with a lousy automatic 60'
But imagine this - 400whp evo X (W/M and tune) with drag radials and 4800 rpm stall converter - 10 seconds? Hell yeah I'm serious! I've seen 420 whp Z28's run 10's
With 5 manual VIII, IX 0 - 60 times need to be like 4.0 to get a 12.5 1/4 mile.
I can't make my mind, not sure how much WTQ the new tranny will take but with tuning and W/M the X should be good for mid 11's, even with a lousy automatic 60'
But imagine this - 400whp evo X (W/M and tune) with drag radials and 4800 rpm stall converter - 10 seconds? Hell yeah I'm serious! I've seen 420 whp Z28's run 10's
But yes, other then that, the base architecture of the engine is the same, but the heads are slightly different.



