Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #9331  
nongan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 572
Likes: 1
From: ca
how about taller and wider?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #9332  
4DR's Avatar
4DR
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
no offense, but this is ridiculous. first off, why would the new evo be more similar to the base than past models. the new evo has even more additions to the already crazy awd system and suspension than ever before. and second, why are we talking about people making a base lancer "look" like an evo, as if that's cool. I mean the base lancer is fine and everything, but it's no evo, no more than a 2.5 RS is an STi. just let the car be what it is. I mean, you could probably buy a kit car Ferrari and make it look like an f430 with a honda civic motor hidden under the hood, but that's just not cool, sorry. I'm not badmouthing the base model lancer, but if you want an evo, spend the money on one, and if you can't afford one, then just be content with your lancer, which is a good car.
+ 1 million. THANK YOU. And that goes for anyone who tried to make their ex/dx civic into an Si. Or thier Nissan sentra into an SE-R, and the list goes on...............
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #9333  
oaleman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale, CA
evo x detail pics

check out the new pics!

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/s...ils/#more-3673
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #9334  
chino ali's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Cybertron
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
no offense, but this is ridiculous. first off, why would the new evo be more similar to the base than past models. the new evo has even more additions to the already crazy awd system and suspension than ever before. and second, why are we talking about people making a base lancer "look" like an evo, as if that's cool. I mean the base lancer is fine and everything, but it's no evo, no more than a 2.5 RS is an STi. just let the car be what it is. I mean, you could probably buy a kit car Ferrari and make it look like an f430 with a honda civic motor hidden under the hood, but that's just not cool, sorry. I'm not badmouthing the base model lancer, but if you want an evo, spend the money on one, and if you can't afford one, then just be content with your lancer, which is a good car.

I agree. I rolled with a IX for 6 months, it was great. I never like any of the old Lancers.
i have the new Lancer, and i am not even thinking of modding mine to look like an X. I love the new GTS.
I plan on using this car to trade in for the X. I am looking to get the MR but who knows?
I wanna steer away from a stick, but ........
Pends on what the price is. I am NOW leaning toward the 135I now. Great looking car, performance and interior 2 tone is beautiful.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #9335  
gofast925's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area California
Originally Posted by oaleman
That new GTRs gonna be a monster! 473 HP...wow
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #9336  
modelchris's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
no offense, but this is ridiculous. first off, why would the new evo be more similar to the base than past models. the new evo has even more additions to the already crazy awd system and suspension than ever before. and second, why are we talking about people making a base lancer "look" like an evo, as if that's cool. I mean the base lancer is fine and everything, but it's no evo, no more than a 2.5 RS is an STi. just let the car be what it is. I mean, you could probably buy a kit car Ferrari and make it look like an f430 with a honda civic motor hidden under the hood, but that's just not cool, sorry. I'm not badmouthing the base model lancer, but if you want an evo, spend the money on one, and if you can't afford one, then just be content with your lancer, which is a good car.
Dude, I'm just saying. Not EVERYONE is dying for alll this speed and handling performance out of a car. SOME people prefer or enjoy exterior styling over all the performance. Personally, I dont really know what I would do with 300 HP....(even though it would be cool to have it, if i needed to pass a person or two), but I love the styling of the evo. That's all i'm saying when I say Evo sort of = base lancer (in styling). Just w/ the diff. of hoods, fenders, and bumbers.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #9337  
modelchris's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
....And FOR THE RECORD...I WANT AN EVO. I'm not against the evo's or really having 280+ HP. I'm just playing devils advocate a bit, and saying that there are people who prefer styling over performance. No disrepect to you guys that are like super fanactics of speed and handling.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #9338  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by FLK
True, and that's something that the X was designed for, great handling plus SST. I believe the 5Speed is an just afterthought to appease the luddites. .
I'm guessing that all of the MR/SST owners are going to be in for a rude awakening when it comes to modding. If Mitsu's SST is anywhere near as integrated as Audi/VW's DSG, then it's not going to be mod friendly _at_all_. Something as simple as an MBC would potentially throw off the entire shift pattern. Hopefully has thought of this when designing the electronics, but I wouldn't count on it...

l8r)
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #9339  
ExcessLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
I'm guessing that all of the MR/SST owners are going to be in for a rude awakening when it comes to modding. If Mitsu's SST is anywhere near as integrated as Audi/VW's DSG, then it's not going to be mod friendly _at_all_. Something as simple as an MBC would potentially throw off the entire shift pattern. Hopefully has thought of this when designing the electronics, but I wouldn't count on it...

l8r)
True afeter the fast adn furious thing mitsu decided they dont want their brand asociated with modding and street raceing sko they design none mod friendly models now.. ie 2000 eclipse.. current galant ETC
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #9340  
cksdayoff's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: pa
the new hotness









Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #9341  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by ExcessLancer
THE NEW X LOOKS NICE BUT IT IS TOO HIGH OFF THE GROUND And that always implies econo box to me... when you thing super car or sports car you think low to the ground and wide stance.. not tall an narrow... Car companies and their ad agancies know this cause any time you see a glamor shot of a car in an ad it is always lower than the one you see on the dealers lot...
it looks pretty low to the ground to me, and the car has a much wider overall stance, with wide tires, bulging fender flares, and an aerodynamic design that looks a lot more like a sports car than ever before. you must not be looking at the same pictures that everyone else is. and btw, the comment about cars always be lowered in advertisements is not true. that's ridiculous. cars that are too high from the factory can look better when lowered, at the expense of ruining the suspension geometry. it prematurely wears out the shocks, and the bump and rebound characteristics of the shocks are then incorrectly set for the springs that have been swapped. the evo is one of the best handling cars in the world, and are always dialed in very precisely from the factory. you'd have to be an idiot to put lowering springs on a evo. if you have to have that lowered look, then buy a set of extremely high end coilovers, and hope to god that the person tuning them is even half as good as the mitsubishi engineers. good luck with that. besides, i guarantee that the evo is capable of more g's around a corner than your capable of handling.

Last edited by STi2EvoX; Oct 23, 2007 at 08:01 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #9342  
jetmn's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis
Originally Posted by modelchris
Dude, I'm just saying. Not EVERYONE is dying for alll this speed and handling performance out of a car. SOME people prefer or enjoy exterior styling over all the performance.
Yes, they are called posers or ricers. The bulging fenders, hood vents and wide tires are there for a reason, not just for looks.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:45 AM
  #9343  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
btw, the comment about cars always be lowered in advertisements is not true. that's ridiculous.
You are right it isn't ALWAYS true, and no the X doesn't look too high to me either, however its funny he mentions that because if you look at most any promo shots of the current Eclipse compared to real life examples you'll see what he means. Even the ones in the early (and maybe current) tv spots were lowered as well as the pictures on the mitsucars.com site.

I guess I'll be having another white Evo in the future. That showroom shot is great thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #9344  
RoyalDetailing's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: City of Orange
Not to sure on the new look
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #9345  
RoyalDetailing's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: City of Orange
Smile ummm

Not to sure on the new look
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 PM.