Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

02 Lancer ES Turbo Project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2010, 10:19 AM
  #751  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
ok car was fully warmed up and then I started logging

im going to start watching those vids now
Attached Files
File Type: zip
2010-07-27-121516.zip (8.3 KB, 0 views)
Old Jul 27, 2010, 10:25 AM
  #752  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
03lances's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Coast WA
Posts: 3,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The first couple of the 6 vid series are a little long and drawn out but he starts right from the beginning so bear with him its definately good info in all 6.
Old Jul 27, 2010, 02:22 PM
  #753  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by steven121
ok car was fully warmed up and then I started logging

im going to start watching those vids now
Idle looked pretty good how does it run though? Still really rich when driving around?
Old Jul 27, 2010, 03:04 PM
  #754  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Idle looked pretty good how does it run though? Still really rich when driving around?
cant even pull out the parking lot with out it dying afrs shoot way low when just barely letting out the clutch.

my injector latency is
volts

4.6875 - 3.312
7.03125 - 1.680
9.375 - 1.032
11.7188 - 0.672
14.0625 - 0.432
16.4062 - .0264
18.6768 - 0.144

Injector scaling is 513

im getting knocks like up to 10 im not sure if there real or not but the afrs stay at a constant 14.9-15.0 they wont go higher or lower. and thats during idle.

So how exactly do i start tuning do i do the timing first, the afrs, injector scaling? its so confusing, im understanding it a little bit and I see that logging is the key. So Im going to need alot of peoples help with my tune and trying to understand so im not so dependent.

heres my log from earlier trying to pull out. its a bit long. I will be on tonight and I might do some tuning as well when i get back from the gf's house. But if you want to look at my rom let me know.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
2010-07-27-154913.zip (36.8 KB, 0 views)
Old Jul 27, 2010, 03:44 PM
  #755  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
nevermind it suppose to rain so I cant take the bike or the car
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:00 PM
  #756  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There is too much data here for starters and probably not the right data.

don't need to log target idle.

afrmap is completely wrong not sure why but 128 is dead wrong

o2 feedback looks funky as hell it should be in a % not just -2 or whatever

All knock based logged items are not knocksum which is what you want and need

Baro has no need here unless you want to see if you overrun your filter

EGRtemp is basically for the most part completely useless

Octane number should read 100 or lower not 255 so something wrong there.

MDP appears to be measuring in kPa but thats just pickyness by me

Latency is dead wrong as a column showing a percentage instead of an integer like it should.

The last column seems to be calculated load but never use that the load the caps at 160 will be fine for you or 1byte if your using tephra's mod.
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:08 PM
  #757  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Moving my post about the log here since my post about the log items takes up too much space.

The log itself looked fairly normal except i can't see your AFR's. You claim they go really rich soon as you touch the throttle. I see a small blip on the injector pulse "async pulse adder" which is like the old carbs that used accelerator pumps.

Besides this you start taking off at an awfully low rpm making it hard to see any real changes especially when we lack AFR monitoring in the log.

Maybe do an experiment and see what happens if you just hold the gas down for a few arbitrary rpm ranges like 3k rpm and 4k rpm and watch your afr. This should give us enough range to figure out if your maf scaling is off or the injectors are off.

Another possibility is the maf compensation table. The evo maf is hugely insensitive to low airflow through it so basically the compensation on a stock evo removes lots of fuel on the low airflow side then it jumps drastically forward. Anything above 50hz is pretty huge in change .
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:11 PM
  #758  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Moving my post about the log here since my post about the log items takes up too much space.

The log itself looked fairly normal except i can't see your AFR's. You claim they go really rich soon as you touch the throttle. I see a small blip on the injector pulse "async pulse adder" which is like the old carbs that used accelerator pumps.

Besides this you start taking off at an awfully low rpm making it hard to see any real changes especially when we lack AFR monitoring in the log.

Maybe do an experiment and see what happens if you just hold the gas down for a few arbitrary rpm ranges like 3k rpm and 4k rpm and watch your afr. This should give us enough range to figure out if your maf scaling is off or the injectors are off.

Another possibility is the maf compensation table. The evo maf is hugely insensitive to low airflow through it so basically the compensation on a stock evo removes lots of fuel on the low airflow side then it jumps drastically forward. Anything above 50hz is pretty huge in change .
I will do that tonight thanks man!!! girl just got here
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:11 PM
  #759  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
oh im using mitsulogger just letting you know
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:18 PM
  #760  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by steven121
oh im using mitsulogger just letting you know
Ah i see probably why some things are screwed up then far as logging goes.

You have the latest version? I do recommend evoscan simply because its less hassle :P.
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:46 PM
  #761  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
link62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he just flashed v7 rom with out putting in anything from his stock rom so he might be running evo timing and fuel with their maf scaling and injector scaling cause he has wrx 440 so his scaling shouldnt be 513
Old Jul 27, 2010, 04:52 PM
  #762  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by link62
he just flashed v7 rom with out putting in anything from his stock rom so he might be running evo timing and fuel with their maf scaling and injector scaling cause he has wrx 440 so his scaling shouldnt be 513
Good catch interesting that it even started
Old Jul 27, 2010, 08:26 PM
  #763  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by link62
he just flashed v7 rom with out putting in anything from his stock rom so he might be running evo timing and fuel with their maf scaling and injector scaling cause he has wrx 440 so his scaling shouldnt be 513
all I changed was what senate posted on a thread about intstructions which should be on page 47-50 of my thread.

the only thing I didnt change was the maf size, open and closed loops, high and low octanes, maf scaling, injector sizes and injector scaling.

I have version 2.0 of mitsulogger
Old Jul 27, 2010, 08:30 PM
  #764  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
steven121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 2,784
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I skipped some directions, I think i need to change the injector latency and the scaling.
Old Jul 27, 2010, 08:51 PM
  #765  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
link62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steven121
I skipped some directions, I think i need to change the injector latency and the scaling.
and maf size and scaling cause i dont think your running an evo 399 maf


Quick Reply: 02 Lancer ES Turbo Project



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 AM.