2017 STU Discussion!
Yea I'm not sure the intricacies as I've never ran an AEM before. From what I've seen there are a lot of moving pieces with it, but certainly more optimal than a stock ECU, and whatever the stock ECU can do with the stock BCS, the AEM can do and better - and apparently, may be legal in this class.
No, that is not the case. The stock boost control setup on an Evo will only ever make so much boost. The way the stock setup works, the solenoid is actually bleeding off pressure that the wastegate see. If the stock boost control solenoid is held shut, you have minimum boost. If it is allowed to open all the way, you see max boost. The car may make a touch more power with the AEM by virtue of better timing and fueling control, but it absolutely, 100%, will not change how much boost the car makes with the stock solenoid and plumbing in place.
No, that is not the case. The stock boost control setup on an Evo will only ever make so much boost. The way the stock setup works, the solenoid is actually bleeding off pressure that the wastegate see. If the stock boost control solenoid is held shut, you have minimum boost. If it is allowed to open all the way, you see max boost. The car may make a touch more power with the AEM by virtue of better timing and fueling control, but it absolutely, 100%, will not change how much boost the car makes with the stock solenoid and plumbing in place.
I'm not super familiar with tuning on AEM, but don't you have to change the MAP sensor so that you can tune for psi based boost vs load based? That wouldn't be legal under the ST* rules.
The proposal regarding the changes to allow open ECUs (open boost via changes in the ECU) and plug-and-play engine control modules is intended to address the inability to enforce the current rule, while continuing to allow common tuning modifications.
I haven't explored into it, so I don't know what it does and does not require, and which aftermarket ECUs require what - but yes, I believe you cannot change sensors. I don't know if that also includes o2 sensors, adding gauges that measure afrs & boost, etc. some come with it
The X also has TPS based boost control, which is cool. Makes power vs TPS much more linear. Doesn't make max boost any higher though.
You can jam 100s into every cell on the WGDC map but you will still be limited by the boost pill/BCS/normally bleed, WG system.
The real solution, as has previously been mentioned here, is to use varying sizes of washers welded into the WG recirc line until you hit your knock limit with the allowed fuel.
edit: looks like I am a bit late to the party...
You don't need to change the MAP sensor if you are running a MAF, the ECU doesn't car how much boost is being made.
The real solution, as has previously been mentioned here, is to use varying sizes of washers welded into the WG recirc line until you hit your knock limit with the allowed fuel.
edit: looks like I am a bit late to the party...
You don't need to change the MAP sensor if you are running a MAF, the ECU doesn't car how much boost is being made.
I'm also willing to bet I can reach out to AEM, let them know about the new ST* ECU rules, and see what they can cook up for ST* legal options. potential decent sized market here depending on how many different cars can run these ECUs
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 154
From: Why do they always call the Evo the Dark Side?
IIRC, standalones are legal now, as long as you can stuff them into the stock housing.










