Dont hold anything back, just because some people who never really contribute other then criticize other people contribution or opinion. Look his thanks on the forum very self explanatory. lol

Go ahead and ask, nothing wrong with that.

 

Was that a Freudian slip .....

 

Rob, if you're going to try to call somewhat out, the least you can do is learn how to speak their language properly. I don't attempt to insult you in Polish.

 

i am Hungarian.

 

Ah, thanks for clarifying that.

 

Good thing I don't try to insult you in Polish then.

 

That would make it all the better if he tried Polish insults.

 

I do work with a lawyer who speaks Hungarian...

 

Maybe he can tell you how to say WTF in Hungarian. May come in handy around here.

 

What does the different MAF sensor position over the Evo X for example, get them?

 

A different MAF sensor position.

 

 

that list says MAP sensor. I'm assuming the car uses both a MAP and MAF sensors, OEM's usually use MAP sensors to measure boost and MAF's for driveablity. so that location for the MAP sensor is where boost is measured... which doesn't makes sense to me unless it has 2 of them (other being in the manifold) and they're using this sensor for additional parameters, maybe some sort of fail safe...

 

The Mustang EcoBoost uses 3 map sensors;
T-map on the intake mani, another T-map on the intercooler outlet, and a 'gut check' 1 bar sensor on the vent hose between the valvecover and intake.
There may be similarities in the FoRS.

 

If there really is an allocation of cars and then no more, this tells me the company is losing money on the car. Otherwise, if they could sell 10 million they would make them.