Focus RS
If Ford wasn't playing hide the ball with their results, then I might think differently. Ford won't even reveal the RS' curb weight. I guess once you take delivery, you get to find out how much it weighs. http://www.ford.co.uk/Cars/Focus-RS
If Ford wasn't playing hide the ball with their results, then I might think differently. Ford won't even reveal the RS' curb weight. I guess once you take delivery, you get to find out how much it weighs. http://www.ford.co.uk/Cars/Focus-RS
There are plenty of numbers tossed out there, including independent weights of which you have been provided.
You're right, even on the US site, there is no curb weight listed.
http://www.ford.com/cars/focus/specifications/view-all/
Across the board, it's to be determined.
No, this doesn't mean Ford is "playing hide the ball" with the weight. No, it doesn't mean the weight is some insane number. No, it doesn't mean the RS is a bad car. It does means you're salty as **** when it comes to the RS.
Ford is quick to highlight that 350hp number. Why not let prospective buyers know all the specifications?
Ford has tested the Focus RS on the ring on at least 2 separate occasions, yet "decided" not to post any results.
I just feel like someone in marketing decided what to reveal and what not to.
Ford has tested the Focus RS on the ring on at least 2 separate occasions, yet "decided" not to post any results.
I just feel like someone in marketing decided what to reveal and what not to.
I am still thinking it will be under 3500 lbs. There is not even a spare tire, (like the Evo X has)
Also I don't know if USA do require a different rear crash beam for the RS then other countries. LIke it was a case with the Evo's.
weight can be one explanation to have similar acceleration as the STI and slower than the R even though it has 350 HP and TQ.
Also I don't know if USA do require a different rear crash beam for the RS then other countries. LIke it was a case with the Evo's.
weight can be one explanation to have similar acceleration as the STI and slower than the R even though it has 350 HP and TQ.
Ford is quick to highlight that 350hp number. Why not let prospective buyers know all the specifications?
Ford has tested the Focus RS on the ring on at least 2 separate occasions, yet "decided" not to post any results.
I just feel like someone in marketing decided what to reveal and what not to.
Ford has tested the Focus RS on the ring on at least 2 separate occasions, yet "decided" not to post any results.
I just feel like someone in marketing decided what to reveal and what not to.
"Obama is quick to say he's an American, but why not let the American people scrutinize his medical records so they can confirm that for themselves?"
Most buyers don't care. Those that do know how to use Google.
Maybe, and this might come as a shock to you, they didn't release the results because they didn't have any actual flat out results. Maybe, just maybe, they were there testing the car so they can continue to develop it rather than doing a hot lap so internet warriors can fight over the results for the next century.
Another shocking revelation, the marketing guys decided not to brag about something as stupid as weight.
So let me get this right, you think Ford took the RS to the ring and didn't see how fast it would go around? Seriously?
Ford has a private test track in Belgium. When you go to the Nürburgring, you bring a watch.
Ford has a private test track in Belgium. When you go to the Nürburgring, you bring a watch.
Yes, seriously. Lots of manufacturers use the Ring for testing. It's a public road after all. Doing a flying hot lap for bragging rights is a different ball game. Hell, that hasn't even possible recently.
http://www.topgear.com/car-news/big-...s-rs-vs-rivals
Did you even read the article? The reviewer liked the RS and attributed the drag race loss to the fact he had to manually shift the car.
Other reviews:
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/ne...lf-r-twin-test
Winner: RS
And it leaves an indelible enough impression to give the Focus RS a win over the Golf R – frankly, over almost anything through corners, if that’s the basis on which we’re judging this comparison. Don’t misunderstand: I’m far from unhappy to climb back into the Golf R for the return leg – probably happier, in fact. As a compromise, as an ownership proposition, the VW still takes a heck of a lot of beating. But as an occasion, as an event, a car for you to simply get into and drive the crackers off of it, the Focus RS is phenomenal.
"Quote:
And it leaves an indelible enough impression to give the Focus RS a win over the Golf R – frankly, over almost anything through corners, if that’s the basis on which we’re judging this comparison. Don’t misunderstand: I’m far from unhappy to climb back into the Golf R for the return leg – probably happier, in fact. As a compromise, as an ownership proposition, the VW still takes a heck of a lot of beating. But as an occasion, as an event, a car for you to simply get into and drive the crackers off of it, the Focus RS is phenomenal. "
Sounds a lot like the EVo test conclusions before, doesn't it? lol
Still seems to me, the RS will be a proper replacement for the Evo on the market.
And it leaves an indelible enough impression to give the Focus RS a win over the Golf R – frankly, over almost anything through corners, if that’s the basis on which we’re judging this comparison. Don’t misunderstand: I’m far from unhappy to climb back into the Golf R for the return leg – probably happier, in fact. As a compromise, as an ownership proposition, the VW still takes a heck of a lot of beating. But as an occasion, as an event, a car for you to simply get into and drive the crackers off of it, the Focus RS is phenomenal. "
Sounds a lot like the EVo test conclusions before, doesn't it? lol
Still seems to me, the RS will be a proper replacement for the Evo on the market.
"Quote:
And it leaves an indelible enough impression to give the Focus RS a win over the Golf R – frankly, over almost anything through corners, if that’s the basis on which we’re judging this comparison. Don’t misunderstand: I’m far from unhappy to climb back into the Golf R for the return leg – probably happier, in fact. As a compromise, as an ownership proposition, the VW still takes a heck of a lot of beating. But as an occasion, as an event, a car for you to simply get into and drive the crackers off of it, the Focus RS is phenomenal. "
Sounds a lot like the EVo test conclusions before, doesn't it? lol
Still seems to me, the RS will be a proper replacement for the Evo on the market.
And it leaves an indelible enough impression to give the Focus RS a win over the Golf R – frankly, over almost anything through corners, if that’s the basis on which we’re judging this comparison. Don’t misunderstand: I’m far from unhappy to climb back into the Golf R for the return leg – probably happier, in fact. As a compromise, as an ownership proposition, the VW still takes a heck of a lot of beating. But as an occasion, as an event, a car for you to simply get into and drive the crackers off of it, the Focus RS is phenomenal. "
Sounds a lot like the EVo test conclusions before, doesn't it? lol
Still seems to me, the RS will be a proper replacement for the Evo on the market.
.....it is the first attempt for a domestic to introduce an AWD hot hatch into the international market.It appears to be having a fairly good reception. Just no RS here yet.
Evolved Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 29
From: Tri-State NY/NJ/CT
I'm sure if the numbers were great at the Ring we would have heard about it. Looking at the Isle of Man video, I'm not sure where the Focus RS would find an advantage. Maybe stability is a greater asset there. Since this is an Evo forum, we know the Evo has proven itself in many different venues and types of racing etc. Expecting that, out if the gate, with the RS is unfair. But not unexpected given the spotlight and Ford's curtain of mystery.