Notices
ECU Flash

MIVEC tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:23 PM
  #556  
Oracle1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
I find 24* works well.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #557  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by lan_evo_mr9
I think this may work well.
The one thing I question is if running full advance at cruising RPM/load will hurt fuel economy. I notice the stock rom is running 19.2 advance in this area which may have been all for fuel economy and drivability's sake.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #558  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
Originally Posted by cij911
Would John / MRFred / NJ / Shameless / others, please repost you current MIVEC setups (it has been quite a while and I imagine things have changed )....

For a stock turbo being pushed hard on Methanol and 91, should the high load MIVEC values be 0 for 6000 rpm + ? Thanks
I think its a great idea to limit MIVEC uptop if you have meth injection.
You dont want that incoming methonal igniting by having the intake valve open to early.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #559  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by lemmonhead
I think its a great idea to limit MIVEC uptop if you have meth injection.
You dont want that incoming methonal igniting by having the intake valve open to early.
What?

So you're saying the injector fuel will magically not ignite, but the much higher flash point, 120 octane methanol would?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #560  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
What?

So you're saying the injector fuel will magically not ignite, but the much higher flash point, 120 octane methanol would?
Isn't it possible to open up the intake valve to early that the exhuast escaping out the intake valve igniting the methonal. I always thought Air enters before the fuel does.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #561  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Lemminghead you need to do a little more learning and a lot less posting of your "theories" as they are confusing to other people and perpetuating incorrect assumptions.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #562  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by recompile
It's not really possible to hold 24psi @ 7000RPM on the stock turbo. 20-21 if you're lucky, but more likely is 18-19.

Are you going by a visual check of your boost gauge? Unfortunately that's not good enough. Logging via a 3 BAR MAP sensor will reveal the bad news to you.
I am holding 23 to 7600 with a MBC, verified by both my dyno and my JDM 3 bar Also please remember I have switched back to a stock turbo as well for the time being.

I will go get the log and the dyno screen print shortly as well as my S2 MIVEC.

Last edited by JohnBradley; Apr 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:43 PM
  #563  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Name:  S2.png
Views: 0
Size:  259.2 KB
Name:  237600.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  64.7 KB
Name:  clean432.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  64.7 KB
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #564  
stockEvoIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Hi John, great post! What octane are you running, what BCS and how much power do you think you can make on 91 oct?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #565  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
Originally Posted by dan l
Lemminghead you need to do a little more learning and a lot less posting of your "theories" as they are confusing to other people and perpetuating incorrect assumptions.
its a fact that more valve overlap means air enters as the exhuast is finishing leaving. NO theory its a FACT.

So if you start your combustion point to long, retard ignition timing, and the "flame is still burning" then this Heat can escape through the intake valve and that is where you meth is coming in.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #566  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by stockEvoIX
Hi John, great post! What octane are you running, what BCS and how much power do you think you can make on 91 oct?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ck-ix-e85.html

On 91 I think my car would be down around 350 tops. I havent ever tried mixing 91 up to see what I can get it to do.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 12:09 AM
  #567  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by lemmonhead
its a fact that more valve overlap means air enters as the exhuast is finishing leaving. NO theory its a FACT.

So if you start your combustion point to long, retard ignition timing, and the "flame is still burning" then this Heat can escape through the intake valve and that is where you meth is coming in.
What you are saying about overlap is 100% correct.

I am not quite following how the intake valve is opening before the exhaust valve on the exhaust stroke (how it reads to me anyway)? Positive pressure will still be pushing any flame front out the exhaust valve (not intake) and this is one cause of the increase in EGTs.

The other thing to keep in mind with MIVEC is where we are in comparison to an VIII on the table with a stock camshaft. If you compared the 2 the intake cam would open in the VIII roughly 19.2* advanced on the MIVEC table (this maybe subject to the 30* range of motion having a negative in the table value). It is for certain no less than 17* on the table as far as equivalent overlap however.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #568  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
that is what I am saying the flame front can somewhat be pressed out the intake valve since this pressure will be Higher than the intake pressure. At any rate say even this was not happening you still have methonal being pushed into the flame front and seems to me this can ignite causing another flame front.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 10:09 PM
  #569  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I must be missing something in your phrasing. What you are describing would mean anytime the intake valve opens it would turn into a blow torch. This doesnt happen obviously as long as the intake pressure exceeds backpressure and flow stays positive through the cylinder.

When it is not all sorts of things can happen, but not quite as it appears you are envisioning it. It take a significant backpressure ratio for reversion to happen and generally most people have stopped trying to add boost at that point.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #570  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
Bradley, that is why MIVEC needs to be zero out at high RPM because the exhuast pressure is higher than the intake and that reversion will take place. That is all the point I was making was take a precaution with to low of ignition timing and to much MIVEC or you will have a blow torch affect
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 AM.