Notices
ECU Flash

MIVEC tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #586  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
You can run a little more timing with less MIVEC once the turbo is lit off. It really is cam and combo dependent though. I can tell with S2s it seems tapering it off and adding the timing in is better than something like Cosworths that need to be kept advanced for awhile to keep them making torque.

aaron
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #587  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
Originally Posted by mrfred
I've been fiddling more with MIVEC at high boost. At first I thought that less MIVEC at high boost was beneficial, but after fiddling more, I'm getting best gains by keeping MIVEC maxed out at 28.8 deg until about 5K rpm even with 27 psi of boost and a relatively restrictive exhaust (stock O2 housing, 100 cell cat).

The thing that was concerning me is that there might be charge flow reversion if the intake was opened too soon because of high residual pressure in the cylinder. In a datalog, this would show up as either no increase in load with more MIVEC or possibly even a decrease in load with more MIVEC (because load scales with airflow). However, even at 27 psi, I get higher loads as MIVEC is increased all the way up to 28.8 deg. Torque is better as well out to 5K rpm. Out past 5K rpm, I need to do more testing to figure out what is working best.
Cool stuff Mr.Fred. Keep up the good work and research. It is much appreciated. It would be really cool if Mivec could be nailed down to a science like timing and AFR. I.E. If you're running this much boost and timing than you should do "this" to your mivec map to get the best results.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #588  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
So, if running M2's, would it be more beneficial to run peak 28.8 to 6K to maintain torque better, or would that be too much?
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #589  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 10
From: New Hampshire, USA
Originally Posted by MR Turco
did you try advancing the cam timing even more?
Yea, the car was very sensitive to knock with more advance. The result map made the most power with no knock. I layered dyno charts of multiple MIVEC maps... first with flat 0's, then 14.4's, then 28.8's to get the end result

Last edited by recompile; Jun 30, 2009 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #590  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
You can run a little more timing with less MIVEC once the turbo is lit off. It really is cam and combo dependent though. I can tell with S2s it seems tapering it off and adding the timing in is better than something like Cosworths that need to be kept advanced for awhile to keep them making torque.

aaron
Kinda figured that. Do you have any insight to JUN 272's and a FP Green at 25-26 psi on 93 ? I know it's a long shot, but it doesn't hurt to ask. I'm using the FP actuator too, which I think usually brings the tq in later, maybe around 5500 rpm with peak load around 280

Last edited by SWOLN; Jul 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #591  
raasfaas's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Fl/Jam
need a little advice on my mivec map from the more experienced...I'm running Kelford 264's on the stock turbo with meth at 29psi. So far with the help of a fellow evoM member this is what I've come up with:

Name:  mivecmapwithcams.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  116.7 KB

From what I have gathered, tapering the timing as it approaches peak tq is best and also in the high rpm area.
If anyone else running the Kelford 264's with stock turbo is willing to share their map that would be great.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #592  
rolly1818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
mivec tuning is really ur setup.

i recently had Johnbradley's map on my car, off boost drivability - the car was awesome!
i was able to push a lot more timing.

then i switched to another map and had to pull timing but the car felt good. the car feel lazy off boost though.

i am currently trying different Mivec maps - but no dyno

NOTE: these were on stock cams and stock turbo.

i think i am gonna work on developing one for a off and on boost i will keep u guys posted. for now i would love some member feedback on what to look for.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #593  
raasfaas's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Fl/Jam
Well I've seen a couple maps floating around the place, I was thinking about trying the one that JohnBradley did for the cosworth's from an old thread: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...orth-cams.html, but then I've been hearing about the map that he did for the S1's (which I think is a closer comparison to the 264 Kelfords) when he was on stock turbo, but I can't find it anywhere...anyone have a link to it?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 07:45 PM
  #594  
krazykorean84's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
This may be a noob question but after reading this tremendously long thread I'm still not sure.

Would it be a bad idea to zero out the mivec map, tune everything else (boost, AFR, Timing) and then come back and perfect/finalize the tune by tuning the mivec map? Thanks for any suggestions/comments.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 07:46 PM
  #595  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 1
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by krazykorean84
This may be a noob question but after reading this tremendously long thread I'm still not sure.

Would it be a bad idea to zero out the mivec map, tune everything else (boost, AFR, Timing) and then come back and perfect/finalize the tune by tuning the mivec map? Thanks for any suggestions/comments.
yes, because boost/AFR/timing will be affected by Mivec as Mivec changes cylinder pressure significantly
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #596  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
Has anyone done any mivec testing with Kelford 272's?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #597  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
okay. i'm trying to cheat. anyone have advice on a MIVEC map for a stock IX MR with Burschur intake kit and full 3" TBE? all else is stock.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #598  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by house_of_senate
Has anyone done any mivec testing with Kelford 272's?
Its very similar to the S2 map I posted up above.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 01:49 AM
  #599  
krazykorean84's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
yes, because boost/AFR/timing will be affected by Mivec as Mivec changes cylinder pressure significantly
So, would it be best to leave mivec stock, tune boost, AFR, timing and then tune mivec followed by a run through of boost, AFR, and timing again?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 06:28 AM
  #600  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by krazykorean84
So, would it be best to leave mivec stock, tune boost, AFR, timing and then tune mivec followed by a run through of boost, AFR, and timing again?
1) Start with a MIVEC map that is close to what you think will be the optimized MIVEC map.

2) Tune AFR, timing, and boost.

3) Try a variation on the MIVEC map.

4) Check/reset AFR, timing, and boost.

5) Check for power increase/decrease.

6) Loop back to #3 until you have what you want.

In my experience, there's not that much to be had in tweaking the MIVEC map. Its worth tuning it, but don't expect to gain 20 whp unless you start with a really lame MIVEC map. More common gains are in the range of 5-10 whp.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 AM.