View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine



152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63



355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny



138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny



109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD



132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo



164
24.01%
Exterior looks



305
44.66%
Interior quality



148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight



79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding



165
24.16%
Price



261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity



133
19.47%
Brakes



163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times



201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll
Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]
Originally posted by seongjdsn
which car is more reliable? (breaks down less) wrx or evo? realistically, i will never race my car--gonna use it as a daily driver. my wife is gonna buy me a car sometime this year and i'm trying to decide between 2k4 wrx or evo. ( i'm would love an evo, but i feel like wrx might be more reliable and practical.
what do you guys think? i would like some advice on this. yeah, i know evo will kick subbie's butt any day performance wise . . . but . . .
which car is more reliable? (breaks down less) wrx or evo? realistically, i will never race my car--gonna use it as a daily driver. my wife is gonna buy me a car sometime this year and i'm trying to decide between 2k4 wrx or evo. ( i'm would love an evo, but i feel like wrx might be more reliable and practical.
what do you guys think? i would like some advice on this. yeah, i know evo will kick subbie's butt any day performance wise . . . but . . .
Great. More
quality bashing.
First of all, Subaru had a recall scandal of their own in 1997 and were forced to recall 1.47 million cars.
Second, most of you base your biased opinions on the DSM Eclipse and Galant. Granted, those cars did and still do have some quality issues.
Build quality and reliability of Japan built
models is nearly equivalent to that of Honda and Toyota.
in both Switzerland and Germany,
is considered as a manufacturer of some of the most reliable cars available. See tha web sites for the ADAC and the TCS (autoclubs for the above mentioned nations).
mode off
Thank you
quality bashing.
First of all, Subaru had a recall scandal of their own in 1997 and were forced to recall 1.47 million cars.
Second, most of you base your biased opinions on the DSM Eclipse and Galant. Granted, those cars did and still do have some quality issues.
Build quality and reliability of Japan built
models is nearly equivalent to that of Honda and Toyota.in both Switzerland and Germany,
is considered as a manufacturer of some of the most reliable cars available. See tha web sites for the ADAC and the TCS (autoclubs for the above mentioned nations).
mode offThank you
Aahh, I'm gonna get flamed prolly, but I'm gonna say go with the STi...
It is especially the car for you if you're looking for 0-60 n' quarter mile. Plus there's all this talk about the watered down Evos now...
It is especially the car for you if you're looking for 0-60 n' quarter mile. Plus there's all this talk about the watered down Evos now...
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
the quality issue is more on US based model, because none of the dealer know how to fix it. but overseas, and in some other place mitsubishi quality is comparable or even better than the rest of the japanese imports. mitsubishi is a newbie compared to the honda and toyota in the US and generally biased opinions about quality. but, US mitsu is getting there.
that is why i said that time will tell. not many "Japanese" cars are made in Japan anymore....they are made here in the US. The EVO will be a true Japanese built vehicle (not assembled in the US) as is the Subaru, so it's really a waiting game. i for one am not out to bash companies, but the US built 2G eclipses were not up to par.
Here ya go. The site is in German, but the graphs are pretty good(actually shows Subaru way ahead of everyone... kinda contradicts what I said...).
But my actual point is,
quality is quite good.
http://www.tcs.ch/tcs.html?/webtcs/T...nt&language=de
The ADAC website has only limited info on
http://www.adac.de/rund_ums_kfz/fahr...78C438D0A519A7
Hope this helps.
But my actual point is,
quality is quite good.http://www.tcs.ch/tcs.html?/webtcs/T...nt&language=de
The ADAC website has only limited info on
http://www.adac.de/rund_ums_kfz/fahr...78C438D0A519A7
Hope this helps.
Last edited by evomk8; Dec 18, 2002 at 10:50 AM.
Originally posted by evomk8
Here ya go. The site is in German, but the graphs are pretty good(actually shows Subaru way ahead of everyone... kinda contradicts what I said...).
But my actual point is,
quality is quite good.
http://www.tcs.ch/tcs.html?/webtcs/TCSPubli.nsf/(DocByID)/(53EA9185769E7884C1256C220047699C)!OpenDocument&la nguage=de
The ADAC website has only limited info on
http://www.adac.de/rund_ums_kfz/fahr...78C438D0A519A7
Hope this helps.
Here ya go. The site is in German, but the graphs are pretty good(actually shows Subaru way ahead of everyone... kinda contradicts what I said...).
But my actual point is,
quality is quite good.http://www.tcs.ch/tcs.html?/webtcs/TCSPubli.nsf/(DocByID)/(53EA9185769E7884C1256C220047699C)!OpenDocument&la nguage=de
The ADAC website has only limited info on
http://www.adac.de/rund_ums_kfz/fahr...78C438D0A519A7
Hope this helps.
Last edited by evomk8; Dec 18, 2002 at 10:51 AM.
Subaru has had plenty of problems with the WRX in the United States. Both the clutch and the tranny have been problem areas for the GDA & GDB Impreza - there have been lots of warranty denials made by Subaru of America - go look at the iclub (or whatever it's called today)...
I've yet to hear of any common Mitsubishi problems aside from turbo'd 2g's and crankwalk. Subaru I've read a good bit on transmission problems. That's about it. I don't know what everyone else has based their responses on yet, but I definitely feel Mitsubishi has better quality across the board. From interior quality to maintenance I think Mitsubishis are built a little bit better. I can't speak well for Mitsubishi's red and yellow paint though...I've seen plenty of problems with those if not maintained.
subaru transmissions I'll admit are the weak link in the WRX's...however, I would venture out to say that over 90% of it would be due to the person behind the wheel.
Last edited by EVOwhat; Dec 18, 2002 at 12:32 PM.
Can't comment on the WRX, but my gf's 2.5RS was definately not overbuilt in any way... problems after problems. The quality of the parts on the Subie seem sub par to me. I can't comment on the US Evo since we won't know till it's here for a while, but I don't care... I've always wanted an Evo.
Mark
Mark
Originally posted by EVOwhat
subaru transmissions I'll admit are the weak link in the WRX's...however, I would venture out to say that over 90% of it would be due to the person behind the wheel.
subaru transmissions I'll admit are the weak link in the WRX's...however, I would venture out to say that over 90% of it would be due to the person behind the wheel.



