Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]
You don't really think Lexus was the first to implement the direct injection do you? The Fuel Stratefied Injection (FSI) has been around for a while now. Take a look at the perennial winner of the LeMans 24 hour race...Audi R8 using FSI technology
Originally Posted by BluByWho
the X is sick, that eclispe Ralliart looks sick too, especially with the 4g63 in it, does it have AWD?
I seriously doubt it otherwise someone would have mentioned it by now. Hell I'd consider flying up there just to see it if that were the case. As it stands, Chicago is a bit too far for me and I've got work-related matters to deal with during that time.
Man I'm eager to see the X at a show soon.
Man I'm eager to see the X at a show soon.
Originally Posted by SWOLN
No, but I do believe the one used in Evo X is closer to the system in the Lexus.
As for manual trannies, wouldn't it likely implement a 6-speed as opposed to 5-speed?
I was surprised that they didn't have either at NAIAS.
They had the Ralliart Raider
No Concept X, no GT-R, no FXX, i was a little disappointed in NAIAS this year. Don't get me wrong there were some nice cars, but just not the biggies I wanted to see.
They had the Ralliart Raider
No Concept X, no GT-R, no FXX, i was a little disappointed in NAIAS this year. Don't get me wrong there were some nice cars, but just not the biggies I wanted to see.
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2n
A couple of people I know are going to the DC show and I asked them to check out the Mitsu booth and snap some picks if either the X or Sportback is there.
Originally Posted by DrSmile
My comment regarding the shifts was more directed towards the paddle shifters it's true. I have driven the DSG, I'm a big VW/Audi fan, but it only had to annoyingly downshift on me once in order for me to dismiss it as not acceptable.
If you've read BW and the other discussions about these systems, a major point highlighted often is the tunability of a LARGE range of characteristics.
Originally Posted by DrSmile
My major point however was that it's MECHANICALLY less efficient, not that it's not fun to drive.
A > B
B > C
Therefore, A > C
Without knowing the B to C relationship, one can't deduce the A to C relationship.
As an example, if the manual transmission is 10% more effecient than an automatic than the effeciency difference is negligble. (Note: I am not saying that is really the % of anything.)
Therefore, you haven't _actually_ proven they are less effecient than a manual transmission.
The larger point everyone seems to have missed so far in the discussion of the Evo X transmission is that none of us actually know anything about it and how the car will be to drive.
Just my 2 pennies...YMMV
D
Don't you think that they'd be advertising that info if it was more efficient than a manual? They don't because the wet clutch can't be more efficient since it always has some slip because there is fluid between the multiple plates. The real non-fun with DSG is going to come around a few years from now when they fail. Any idea how much a replacement mechanism costs? You really think it's going to be comparable to a clutch?






