Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

Why didn't you buy the STI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #226  
fastassfourdoor's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: columbus georgia
evo has great history

becuase the evo has a great line of history and its such a beautifull machine..
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 01:47 AM
  #227  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
because evo look better and it will cost much less for an evo to get to 300who than an sti
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 01:57 AM
  #228  
mrbkkt1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 1
From: Aiea, Hawaii
Honestly???:
Leather and a moonroof, also i hate that flat four sound, and evo's were so much more rare before.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #229  
dogfacker's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: ohio
the way i drive don't match the sti
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 05:58 AM
  #230  
s2kguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
I owned one, didn't like it and sold it for a s2k. Now my Evo MR is being picked up next week.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #231  
jamesvoils's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
I drove both before i picked up my evo, and have even ridden with some at track days. The handeling on the evo is better, but the STi has more power out of the box. You can feel that little extra power when sitting in it. But to me it was the way they look, they just look better.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #232  
VictoryEVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Memphis,TN.
Iam opposite of Advanap I work part time as a Volkswagen Tech and went to the Mitsu dealer that is owned by the same guy as the Volk dealership that I work for and they would not pay me a bit of attention so I contacted the general service manager about it and went and picked up my Evo..... anyway have driven both, the STI is a nice car but an EVo is in a different catagory IMO
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #233  
Max-Q's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: NE of Kryptonite
I couldn't decide so I ended up buying both.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #234  
shift_fast's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by riceball777
because evo look better and it will cost much less for an evo to get to 300who than an sti
Im agree with riceball. I personally dont like the way sti's looks
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #235  
EVO8 WHOA's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Millersburg, OHIO
cause its gey
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #236  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by Max-Q
I couldn't decide so I ended up buying both.
That's awesome. I wish I had the cash to buy both. My wife gets the next new car, which should be quite soon, but she's not about the Evo. She thinks the STI and the Evo are both a bit on the "immature ricer" side, and does not want a vehicle with a manual transmission. I'm trying to talk her into a Forester XT or Legacy GT. I guess they're the next best thing for what she may be looking for.....
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #237  
EvolutionIX_MR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I test drove both, but the 06 STi front end is gross IMO....
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 06:43 PM
  #238  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by vitoal18t
a). Heavier
b). Lazy Steering
c). Softer Suspension
i agree ^^
was also pretty boring to drive compared to the evo
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #239  
Evo IX MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by Fittest
At the risk of getting flamed, I actually chose the STI over the Evo after several months of research and several test drives each.

STI felt better for daily driving versus the Evo's tendency to boost suddenly. I also felt more planted (Jeremy Clarkson actually states this in Top Gear) though I am the first to admit that the Evo's handling is much sharper.

I didn't like the Evo's steering wheel "bouncing" from left to right because of its super sensitive steering; the clutch play on the Evo was also too long for my taste and shifting just didn't come as naturally (felt jerky and/or overrevving between gears).

Interiorwise, I love the Evo's seats and the way they felt...my first words were "Oh man" when I felt those Recaros. I really couldn't care less about the dash for either cars but I guess people say the STI's looks more well put together. Meh.

Lastly, I didn't base my decision on how I was treated at dealerships since I know the cars have nothing to do with that. I was treated very well at some Subaru and some Mitsu dealers, I was treated not so well at some Subaru and some Mitsu dealers (even with my credit score on hand sporting a 720+ FICA).

Whenever asked about either car, my response is the same:

If I wanted a weekend, track monster I would have definitely gone for the Evo. Stupid power and speed for much cheaper and the handling to go along with it. Since this is my only car and obviously my daily driver, the STI gives me more than I could possibly want and the comfort to go with it. Also, whether it's true or not, STIs seem to appeal to an older crowd and Evos seem to appeal to a younger crowd. I am an older crowd

Good luck on your purchase. You cannot possibly go wrong with either car. Oh for what it's worth, I'm not shy in saying that I love the Evo look over the STIs, especially in photographs. But in person, I'd say there's a certain refined look to the 06s (which I have) that can only be appreciated through the naked eye. Aspen White on Gold FTW!

I also noticed that the STI feels like it is much more planted on the ground. Weird.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #240  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by Evo IX MR
I also noticed that the STI feels like it is much more planted on the ground. Weird.
It's because the Subaru AWD system is assymmetrical, while the Evo's is not.

Head into a corner, and upon mid-corner when you get back on the gas for a quick exit, the weight transfer causes the front end to lift, resulting in understeer. That's nothing an anti-lift kit (ALK) won't take care of. With the ALK, it will keep the front end planted. STis with nothing more than an ALK will handle just as well as an Evo will, if not slightly better. Driving an STi/STI with/without an ALK is like night and day.

The largest problem with the STi's handling lies within the front suspension geometry. The ALK will relocate some of the suspension components, resulting in a much more competent suspension geometry.

Last edited by Sinister Subaru; Dec 2, 2006 at 08:44 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 PM.