Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

RRM Short Ram Intake discussion thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #556  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by evo_soul
Gains are something hard to really calculate, if you remove a stock setup, what you really doing is recovering horse power vs. creating it thru any special effect or technology. This is where all these claims about 2 stage this or vortex that.
In my opinion, a short ram in essence is to remove restriction and provide open mouth air access to your engine (number 1). When you play with different designs you may get a further boost in performance if its done correctly, different engines differnet cars and setups make the results vary.

Drop ins in general are designed to allow air to flow better thru a stock setup, again more HP recover but not as much as a SRI with my experience that is. I cant really comment on the WORKS drop in cause i havent had a chance to use it. But their dyno results and project work speaks for itself as a worthy option.

Same would go for the Version one of the RRM brand, they have sold it, havent had any serious problems to date thats been reported, and it does recover horsepower. Their announced efforts are good to hear, as they try to improve on the current design and create more horsepower thru better design.

The problem people who are new to tuning is that they select the wrong upgrades for the wrong application / driving use. Or the dont under stand the drawbacks of what they are buying.

If your someone who is concerned with performance then i suggest you dyno the car parts yourself, these dynos are based on a stock setup. They do not account for changes to multiple upgrades, when you get into Pulleys, Intakes, Exhausts, of different types they all have a +/- minus factor on certain aspects of performance.

I have seen many cars in my time some done well, some done not so well, but you always meet a guy who is always *****ing that his ride just isnt fast enough off the line or responding like he wants it to, But looking at his setup, he had all the wrong mods, it was claiming to a warrior and the sword you carry weighs 3 times what is should, you can swing it around, it can do alot of damage but its not balanced, you cant use it effectivly, and if you keep going at that rate your going to hurt yourself!

Something to think about.

Cheers

Well said. The dyno game is sometimes getting played on people here. I remember a Magnaflow banner that stated the h.p. gains of their catbacks on it. THe numbers were 3 times what we had personally experienced. No one questions it cause it is Magnaflow. If a panel filter is claiming 7+ h.p. on a Lancer then I feel really good about the numbers from our SRI with far less restriction than a stock snorkel with an aftermarket panel.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #557  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by 08Lancer89
Heck Yea I am liking your intake! I would have just got the Exhaust but I had to buy new subs. Are you making a newer verson of the the Exhaust anytime soon? If you are maybe I will just hold off a little longer.
NO changes to exhaust are needed.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #558  
08Lancer89's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 2
From: SWFL
Originally Posted by ROCK
NO changes to exhaust are needed.

ROAD/RACE
Okay cool , have you ever thought of making the same style exhaust but dual???? Just asking. Becasue I know people on here are doing it or waiting for companys to come out with evo x like exhaust and rear bumper cover

BACK TO THE SRI

So Rob do you think that we could have added 8-9 more HP with your intake?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #559  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
8-9 is fair estimate for our intake. Again if peole are claiming that much from a panel filter then we have no issue claiming 8-9. As for exhaust, a dual is possible but we need to see the demand for it before we make one. Also we are working on a rear lip so we may make something that will accomodate a dual.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #560  
Battousai's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Chi Town
Dual Exhaust would be tight, if we wanted to make a conversion that is...
Might as well bought an Evo X in the first place then.
But some people like ourselves like a challenge.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #561  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Still deciding about the dual thing.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #562  
Elvis077's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Definatly do the dual!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #563  
evo_soul's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 1
From: the land between lancer and evo
lol ya do dual hehhehe

But need i remind everyone this is the intake thread lol, So rock any time line on that V2? 1 month out, 2?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #564  
WhiteGTS18's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Albany
yeah ill put a deposit down for a nice dual exhaust and a lip kit that covers the stock cutout and adds two others. i could only imagine how much that would be if most axle backs are like 350 but it would look really nice and sound even better.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #565  
krnkimchi702's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: freezer
forget that rock.. just focus on ur turbo LOL
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #566  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
As evo soul already said, stop talking about other crap. This thread is about the SRI.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #567  
08Lancer89's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 2
From: SWFL
Sorry Guys just had to bring it up, So V2 of the intake is how far out? Rob your syaing we could have 8-9 more HP with the V1 SRI thats sweeet!
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #568  
Bonburner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: CA
hey, im new here and im thinkin about getting an 08 lancer es and i was wondering what RRM plans on making different with the 2nd version - design? shape? angle? size? etc.

and how does the RRM's intake fit but not fujitas on both cvt and manual?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #569  
Bonburner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: CA
another question, will RRM make something like this : http://stores.speedcorps.com/Detail.bok?no=294
for their SRI? i think itd b perty useful

course i duno crap x_x
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #570  
Nosman's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Qc , Canada
Originally Posted by Bonburner
course i duno crap x_x
I see that , no use for a water shield with a SRI ...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 PM.