Subscribed!! I'm getting ready to buy cams... So I'll wait to see what happens.

 

Why are the graphs all scaled differently? It would be easier to compare if you kept the scaling on all graphs the same.

 

It looks like the FP 4R is close to the same specs as a JUN 272, should be interesting...

 

cant wait to see S2 results

 

 

Same here. The TURBO mag will prob come out before we see it here though.

 

The second mag is already out, and the S2 cams are not in that one. Still a good write up though...more info than I could've imagined.

 

 

I just ordered the kelford 272s I wanna see what the outcome would be

 

All graphs are scaled the same, they all go up in 50hp increments...

Its just the first graph doesn't goo all the way to 600 because it would just be alot of empty space...

 

 

they might go in the same increments but their not scaled the same, look at speed along the bottom, one graph starts at 15mph, one starts at 0. All i was trying to do was overlay the different curves to get a comparison from Tomei 280 vs Crane. If the graphs were scaled the same on both mph and power axis this would make it very simple to overlay any dyno in the test and get an accurate comparison. If all graphs posted were set up the same, we can easily compare any cams we want by overlaying the 2 dyno sheets.

you can see what i mean here.. It appears the tomei 280 has the same midrange as the crane 272, but the Tomei overpowers them in the top end.

 

also, which tomei 280 was posted, the hydrolic or solid?

 

Will AMS do this on a MIVEC head?

 

bump