Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #2716  
Jeffs2006EVOIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
The Post

One thing that I don't get is why Mitsubishi is sticking with Chrysler for a chassis. Especially since Chrysler sold their stock in Mitsubishi and have no financial gain with Mitsubishi. Seems to me, Mits is looking to buy parts as cheaply as possible to keep cost down, and modifying them to perform to their standards. I also have read that many of these so called "clutchless" manuals have had problems. BMW, Mercedes, as well as Porche that have been usuing them for a while have had many recalls and complaints about them. They are just now getting it down. Seems to me, keeping up with the Jones's with this "clutchless" thing is really a fad. I do like the thought of a automatic EVO though, Hell my Mom would buy one if it was an Auto, so maybe that is what they, they being Mits, is trying to do. Make the EVO more marketable. I don't know guys, I like my 100% Mits engineered and built, Chassis and all, EVO IX. I have a feeling an EVO X with all the gadets, and the auto is going to push $40K. I am the first to call that one......The price to try to keep one uping the competition.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #2717  
Jeffs2006EVOIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
The Post II

I have also read in the new Motor Trend that the new Chrysler/Dodge Caliber SRT4 is supposed to have 300+ HP and possible AWD. You can kinda put two and two together on this one guys........mmmmm We will see, I still don't get the link of the two companies anymore since the Diaomond Star group is no more. Meaning Chrysler and Mits. I am scratching my head on this one. But, a Caliber Chassis, maybe sharing and engine, awd system....mmmm makes you think doesn't it.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #2718  
trevor's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by wingless
Shares a platform w/ teh next gen PT Cruiser??!! Thats just not right
+1! Let's hope they're wrong!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #2719  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Jeffs2006EVOIX
One thing that I don't get is why Mitsubishi is sticking with Chrysler for a chassis.
You would "get" if if you bothered to read the thread you posted in. It is Chrysler that is sticking with Mitsubishi's platform. Just becuase Chrysler no longer owns a stake in Mitsu doesn't mean that can't continure to collaborate on projects. That seems to be a tough concept for a lot of people around here to wrap their heads around. In that case, this site should keep most of you busy for a long time:

http://www.jama.or.jp/world/tieup/tieup_1t1.html

Mind you it is dated March of 2005, so the former 20.7% DCX state in MMC is still on there. As you can see there are a lot of companies that work together and don't own any portion of their partners.

Last edited by GPTourer; Jan 18, 2006 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #2720  
evoCS's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 1
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
^^^ In reference to the last few posts, DaimlerChrysler is using the Mitsubishi platform, NOT the other way around. There are a couple of indications of this a few posts back. You all can relax. DCX will have not say in the development of the Evo X. And you can bet Mitsu won't let the Evo be upstaged by a Caliber SRT!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #2721  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
Is it me, or does it look as though we may be getting dual exhaust?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #2722  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by PVD04
Actually, it is S-AWC in the X. It takes the S-AYC a few steps further. I don't remember the details, and actually feel fairly ignorant posting about it without remembering much, but if you search there is information out there on it.

-Paul
Yeah the latest issue of SCC has a article about the X and there's a diagram (supplied by appearantly) that shows the S-AWC or Super All Wheel Control and how it ties together the Active Steering, Active Braking, Roll Control Suspension, ACD, and Super AYC.

It also shows the buildings that Evos are built in, and it looks like 2 old sheds.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #2723  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Killboy
It also shows the buildings that Evos are built in, and it looks like 2 old sheds.
With the sweat-shop workers runing around as well!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #2724  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by Nez136
With the sweat-shop workers runing around as well!
Yup, working on an Evo Wagon. Wow this thread has gone completely sideways.

So back to the EvoX at the ring, I think we've decided to get one as our next car. I'm going to keep the X close to stock and keep the VIII as our little race car.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #2725  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Killboy
Yup, working on an Evo Wagon. Wow this thread has gone completely sideways.

So back to the EvoX at the ring, I think we've decided to get one as our next car. I'm going to keep the X close to stock and keep the VIII as our little race car.
that is a good idea, but damn, insurance would be through the roof!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #2726  
gtr's Avatar
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 1
I dont' know if i'd go with the evo X. I'll think about it if they offer a traditional 6 speed manual.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #2727  
threepointsix's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: S. Houston ClearLake
haha.... used an RS shell.....no rear wiper, alum roof, mirror-less visors. Lets not worry about wheel width excitement on the X (I like many use 18/9.5's on my VIII) I wanna know whats cookin under the test hood of the new car due in only 12 more mos? Is that a chick rolling shotgun? No wonder they get sexual harrasment suits at corporate....shes probably all hot and worked up by big boys skillz? One last thing...anyone else notice whats up with the headlamp housings bulbs?

Last edited by threepointsix; Jan 18, 2006 at 09:16 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #2728  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by bdking57
dude.. i love all new IX owners who are getting all but hurt by this car.. bottom line is the IX is vastly superior to the VIII in refinement.. but there is no way I would trade an VIII for a IX.. when this thing is gonna oblierate the CT9A platform in every category.. the handling is gonna be insane! not to mention actually looks like a refined sports car.
I don't relish in the misery of others, but I do think it's gonna be sweet trading my '05 EVO MR for one of those EVO Xs... That car looks like it's gonna rock! The whole thing promises to be newer and improved. There is noise about the power output being in the 300 plus hp with torque to match! I look forward to the new clutch-pedalless tranny. I believe I could get used to the paddle shifters just like the F1 drivers do . Also, not having to shift gears when it's inconvenient can be priceless. Don't forget, it has not one but 2 clutches... It's definitely not a clutchless car... It has no torque converter, but that's no great loss. I think it's gonna be a great car and definitely worth waiting for
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 09:39 PM
  #2729  
evo_rc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 4
From: Hot Az!!
To the haters, I bet you guys are the first one to be trading your current evo when the evo x comes out. Stop hating, since when in the evolution history did mitsubishi disappoint on a new evolution? I think the evo x will be sick period....

Last edited by evo_rc; Jan 18, 2006 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #2730  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by evo_rc
To the haters, I bet you guys are the first one to be trading your current evo when the evo x comes out. Stop hating, since when in the evolution history did mitsubishi disappoint on a new evolution? I think the evo x will be sick period....
I'm not sensing any "hating" really, perhaps you could quote someone?

Like I said previously, I'm planning to get one, but I can see how it's not the car for everyone...MOST everyone on here probably. It's pretty clear that the car is going in a different direction to entice a larger market...a larger, easier-to-drive car that is not so cutting edge. (like CutCo, or EdgeCom...or InterSlice (who get's that one?))
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:07 AM.