Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Focus RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 08:05 AM
  #1456  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone

We still don't know what turbo is on it, but if it's a BW K04, it's pretty close to maxed out. So a substantial power increase like we are used to getting with bolt ons and tuning with an Evo would require a turbo upgrade on the FoRS if that is the case.
If it is close to the Garrett Honeywell TS turbo that the Mustang has, people are getting +100whp/+100wtq out of it with standard bolt ons. I would say that is pretty inline with Evos.

But since we don't know the actual turbo on the FoRS is going to be yet, this is speculation.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 08:09 AM
  #1457  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by MisterRegato
watch the vid rob posted half way down the page (work wont let me on youtube)

the guy cant drive for **** apparently then...

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...y-evo-x-2.html

its a head to head against the evo and golf r
With all the nannies off (which you cannot with a showroom stock MK6R like in that review, without an Ecu tweak), the MK6 R is able to get sideways. I know, because I owned one and did it many times.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 08:34 AM
  #1458  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by razorlab
If it is close to the Garrett Honeywell TS turbo that the Mustang has, people are getting +100whp/+100wtq out of it with standard bolt ons. I would say that is pretty inline with Evos.

But since we don't know the actual turbo on the FoRS is going to be yet, this is speculation.
I'm only guessing its a K04 because the FoST has a K03.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 08:48 AM
  #1459  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
At this point, I can't even tell who likes the car. It would help if each poster ended each post with a rating of how much they like the Focus RS.

RS Fanboy rating: 6/10.

Reasons why I like it: I like the direction Ford is going and I hope to see future RS models (cough Fiesta RS)

Reasons why I don't love it: conservative styling, fwd biased awd system, no weight saving measures taken.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 09:01 AM
  #1460  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
i am easy. i like it so far. We will see how it will graduate on tracks, but i have a very little doubt .
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 09:39 AM
  #1461  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
I hate everything.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 09:43 AM
  #1462  
MisterRegato's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 4
From: PA
I give it 3 rotten tomatoes out of 10
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 09:50 AM
  #1463  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Originally Posted by nemsin
At this point, I can't even tell who likes the car. It would help if each poster ended each post with a rating of how much they like the Focus RS.

RS Fanboy rating: 6/10.

Reasons why I like it: I like the direction Ford is going and I hope to see future RS models (cough Fiesta RS)

Reasons why I don't love it: conservative styling, fwd biased awd system, no weight saving measures taken.
It's hard to say how much you like a car you've never driven or even seen in person.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 10:14 AM
  #1464  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by hotrod2448
It's hard to say how much you like a car you've never driven or even seen in person.
Of the thousands of different models that have been made since the Model T, most people only ever get to have first hand experience with a handful of them. I will probably never get to drive a Ferrari, doesn't stop me from liking them.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 10:38 AM
  #1465  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Originally Posted by nemsin
Of the thousands of different models that have been made since the Model T, most people only ever get to have first hand experience with a handful of them. I will probably never get to drive a Ferrari, doesn't stop me from liking them.
Yes, but how much do you like them compared to say a McLaren or Lambo? If you haven't driven or even just been in the presence of one you don't really know do you? You like it a 6/10 compared to what 0 being walking and 10 being an F1 car? Or 6/10 compared to $35-40K cars?

You know you like the idea of it, you just don't know if you are going to like the reality of it. I think that is where most of us are with RS. I'm happy the car is going to exist, overall I like most of what the car has going on, but that doesn't mean it will translate to a car I like enough to buy or a car I'd even like the way it drives.

Quite a few years ago I thought I wanted an S4. I liked the all wheel drive, german understated luxury, V8 engine, what's not to like? It was the worst car I've driven in a long long time, gutless, ridiculously hard suspension, steering that felt like it wasn't hooked to anything, just awful.

I got an i3 for a loaner a few months ago, laughed at it, thought it looked like a ******* on wheels, interior styled by whole foods and I actually really enjoyed driving it. Very underrated car.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 10:40 AM
  #1466  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I'm only guessing its a K04 because the FoST has a K03.
I'm guessing it's going to be closer to the Garrett that the 2.3L ecoboost in the Mustang gets since they are sharing the basic motor and the 2.3L has a twin scroll turbo, the first Ecoboost to utilize one.

I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't a larger Garrett on the FoRS since the car makes a bit more horsepower than the Mustang.

Much like most of the people in this thread, I don't agree with some of the FoRS decisions, however I am really excited to see what the 2.3L can do with some Ethanol.

I've already personally seen how the 1.6L Ecoboost responds. Even the dinky 1.6L with a turbo the size of a baby hand picks up +100wtq / +50whp with only a tune and E40, everything else stock.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 10:47 AM
  #1467  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by hotrod2448

Quite a few years ago I thought I wanted an S4. I liked the all wheel drive, german understated luxury, V8 engine, what's not to like? It was the worst car I've driven in a long long time, gutless, ridiculously hard suspension, steering that felt like it wasn't hooked to anything, just awful.

I got an i3 for a loaner a few months ago, laughed at it, thought it looked like a ******* on wheels, interior styled by whole foods and I actually really enjoyed driving it. Very underrated car.
This is funny, I had the EXACT same two experiences except the S4 was the newer V6 SC. I was set on the S4, drove a couple. That car is highly over rated.

i3. I laughed at a bunch of friends that got that *** ugly thing. Then I drove one, very enjoyable for what it is.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 11:23 AM
  #1468  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by hotrod2448
You like it a 6/10 compared to what 0 being walking and 10 being an F1 car? Or 6/10 compared to $35-40K cars?
6/10 based on what, in my mind, the Focus RS "could have been". I think they have done a lot of things right, and a few things very wrong.

I wonder who Ford thinks is their target market for this car? Why not include fender flares? Doesn't RS stand for "Rally Sport." As far as I can tell, there is nothing Rally about the car. Why not try to use weight saving materials? The fact that Ford is already talking about a "hotter" version means even the engineers already know what areas to improve. http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/ne...cus-rs-planned
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 11:32 AM
  #1469  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
"Could have been"? Well in that case I give my ***** 9/10 cause it could have been 10 inches long, but it's not.

Ford appears to be targeting the same market as the STI, Evo (soon to be gone), and the Golf R, among others. Of the cars available, the STI is arguably the most extreme, and that comes up again and again in reviews. You either love the way it looks, or hate it. Cars like the RS and The Golf R, on the other hand, have less extreme styling, which is a safer avenue to go for, and potentially means wider appeal. I agree that I'd like flares, but I'm a 30 year old male who keeps Lego models of cars in his office.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2015 | 11:36 AM
  #1470  
MisterRegato's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 4
From: PA
coulda woulda shoulda you don't work for ford ya dun know what it could have been "in my mind" easy scape goat is easy
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 AM.