Notices
ECU Flash

Let's see your fully tuned timing maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2012 | 10:03 AM
  #1906  
stunt2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
stock VIII 10.5 turbo mate and old gen Greddy profec B ebc. wish I could make to hold more boost up top. gotta try hallman

knocks on spool up, I think due to my aggresive afr's. I'll sort that out, it is my first log. is timing high too ?

as a side note it's 2.3 with S2 cams and 3" turboback

Last edited by stunt2; Nov 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2012 | 10:24 AM
  #1907  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
I'd think your low boost timing is a touch aggressive .

With my s2 cams I'm down to 4 or 5 degrees closer to your 100 load mark around sub 4k.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2012 | 10:30 AM
  #1908  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by stunt2
stock VIII 10.5 turbo mate and old gen Greddy profec B ebc. wish I could make to hold more boost up top. gotta try hallman

knocks on spool up, I think due to my aggresive afr's. I'll sort that out, it is my first log. is timing high too ?

as a side note it's 2.3 with S2 cams and 3" turboback
A little agressive on your logged run from 4750 up top. Mainly because you don't hold boost. If your car doesn't knock, I'd say that this is okay. At 15-16psi it's somewhat normal to be able to run that much timing, especially on 93. Just make sure you're not always on the edge of knocking.
Your 10.5 VIII won't be able to hold much boost with that cammed 2.3L, which sucks craploads of air ...
maybe ECU boost would hold a little more but not much.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #1909  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
Thoughts? seems like it likes the timing fairly low on the low end.
Attached Thumbnails Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-asdfasdfasdf.jpg   Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-reareaq.png  
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 09:37 PM
  #1910  
Ian0611's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 5
From: IL
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
Thoughts? seems like it likes the timing fairly low on the low end.
What fuel? Also, are you on SD? Just curious why load is so high for your boost levels. timing does seem pretty low in the low and mid RPMs. Will it not take any more than that?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 10:14 PM
  #1911  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
Yes sd. There's a ton of resolution though so it seems kinda drawn out but it's not that bad

93 oct my kpa load 1:1.

Still trying to sneak an degree in here and there but as of now my clutch is weak :/

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Nov 14, 2012 at 10:25 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 12:45 AM
  #1912  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Hi, wanted to share my ignition map. That is 2,3l, stock evo9 turbo, kelford tx272, hitting 280-300 peak load depending on the gear at 25-26psi peak boost, 93 octane (98ron). No WOT knock, sporadic spool up knock.

Any input would be aprecciable.



updated
Attached Thumbnails Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-2.3l-timing.jpg  

Last edited by Biggy VIII; Mar 2, 2013 at 05:48 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 06:13 AM
  #1913  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by Biggy VIII
Hi, wanted to share my ignition map. That is 2,3l, stock evo9 turbo, kelford tx272, hitting 280-300 peak load depending on the gear at 25-26psi peak boost, 93 octane (98ron). No WOT knock, sporadic spool up knock.

Any input would be aprecciable.

Too much timing at low rpm, full boost IMO.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #1914  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
Yes sd. There's a ton of resolution though so it seems kinda drawn out but it's not that bad

93 oct my kpa load 1:1.

Still trying to sneak an degree in here and there but as of now my clutch is weak :/
What kind of turbo and mods? That seems really low at 350 load. But what do I know I was running way too high on my top end
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:29 AM
  #1915  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by Raptord
Too much timing at low rpm, full boost IMO.
Raptord,

I'm still trying to learn here. So are you saying at full boost (Load 280) timing is too high? I'd agree with that. What about loads 100-120? It seems high to me.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:59 AM
  #1916  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by 10isace
Raptord,

I'm still trying to learn here. So are you saying at full boost (Load 280) timing is too high? I'd agree with that. What about loads 100-120? It seems high to me.
Yep, from around 240-onwards or so, timing should be lower. I'd say 3° at 280/3500rpm.

100-120 might be a tad high as well, but not as alarmingly as high load.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #1917  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Originally Posted by Raptord
Yep, from around 240-onwards or so, timing should be lower. I'd say 3° at 280/3500rpm.

100-120 might be a tad high as well, but not as alarmingly as high load.
The goal is to make the most torque in low to mid RPM.

Why do you consider it to be too high? As far as it makes power and doesnt knock...
Attached Thumbnails Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-2.3-ign-map-trace.jpg   Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-2.3-ign-map-trace-2.jpg   Let's see your fully tuned timing maps-2.3-ign-map-trace-3.jpg  

Last edited by Biggy VIII; Nov 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 12:13 PM
  #1918  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by Biggy VIII
The goal is to make the most torque in low to mid RPM.

Why do you consider it to be too high? As far as it makes power and doesnt knock...
Just because it doesn't knock doesn't mean it's perfectly safe. Your rods could be taking a beating from that much timing without it actually knocking.

6-8 degrees at peak torque is usually E85/race gas territory, not pump gas.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 12:24 PM
  #1919  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Biggy VIII
The goal is to make the most torque in low to mid RPM.

Why do you consider it to be too high? As far as it makes power and doesnt knock...
I don't think it has much room for high air temp, bad fuel. Your 93 seems good up there in Russia ... For street it's "acceptable" IMO.
A lot of people with US 93 run around 4* at peak, you are a little agressive.

Last edited by domyz; Nov 15, 2012 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 12:37 PM
  #1920  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Raptord
Your rods could be taking a beating from that much timing without it actually knocking.
Assuming he went further than MBT... but on pump gas?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 AM.