Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]
Err....the Evo looks like the Lancer because, well....it IS a LANCER! Hence LANCER Evolution! Geez...when will some people get a clue?
Do you not realize that the Evo came AFTER the Lancer? I'm sick of hearing people saying 'The Evo looks like a base Lancer etc. etc.'...well, in that case, buy a Murcielago because it won't be mistaken for a 'base' Gallardo....
We drive an econobox with extra spot welds, a reworked engine and some different body panels....whoopdeefrickingdoo! Don't delude yourselves into thinking it's a supercar because it's not......
BTW, only the Evo VII-IX are markedly different from the Lancer in terms of head/taillights and general body styling (compare the Evo to the Lancer Ralliart). Previous models were very very similar...maybe an extra foglight in the front bumper, bigger wing, new front bumper etc.....but not to the extent it is now...
For one, I'm kinda glad that they're moving back to making these cars more homogeneous looking....
Do you not realize that the Evo came AFTER the Lancer? I'm sick of hearing people saying 'The Evo looks like a base Lancer etc. etc.'...well, in that case, buy a Murcielago because it won't be mistaken for a 'base' Gallardo....
We drive an econobox with extra spot welds, a reworked engine and some different body panels....whoopdeefrickingdoo! Don't delude yourselves into thinking it's a supercar because it's not......
BTW, only the Evo VII-IX are markedly different from the Lancer in terms of head/taillights and general body styling (compare the Evo to the Lancer Ralliart). Previous models were very very similar...maybe an extra foglight in the front bumper, bigger wing, new front bumper etc.....but not to the extent it is now...
For one, I'm kinda glad that they're moving back to making these cars more homogeneous looking....
Newsflash, the Evo X isn't really an Evo, and it is going to suck donkey *****. No 4G63, instead you get a crappy watered down aluminum block. No Japanese designed chassis (you get a craptastic Dodge Caliber derived SUV chassis instead). The car will be heavier than ever before, and will suck really, really, really, really, really hard. If you have an Evo 9, consider yourself lucky to have the last of the true performance oriented Evolutions. Amen.
Newsflash, the Evo X isn't really an Evo, and it is going to suck donkey *****. No 4G63, instead you get a crappy watered down aluminum block. No Japanese designed chassis (you get a craptastic Dodge Caliber derived SUV chassis instead). The car will be heavier than ever before, and will suck really, really, really, really, really hard. If you have an Evo 9, consider yourself lucky to have the last of the true performance oriented Evolutions. Amen.
I however am not going to speculate whether it will "suck really really really hard" or not. But rather, I'll patiently wait until people are actually driving and modifying them and proving whether or not they can handle higher boost levels on that aluminum block, and whether or not that handling, acceleration, braking etc has gone down the tubes. Then I'll know.
for the record, I don't think that will be the case. If i had to guess, I think it will be the most impressive performing Evo ever albeit a bit bloated to appeal to a larger market.
Amen? gimme a break. time will tell. You may be right, and when that time comes you can pat yourself on the back (because no one else will) and tell yourself, "I knew it" and you self esteem may feel good for a day or so until it wears off.
I however am not going to speculate whether it will "suck really really really hard" or not. But rather, I'll patiently wait until people are actually driving and modifying them and proving whether or not they can handle higher boost levels on that aluminum block, and whether or not that handling, acceleration, braking etc has gone down the tubes. Then I'll know.
for the record, I don't think that will be the case. If i had to guess, I think it will be the most impressive performing Evo ever albeit a bit bloated to appeal to a larger market.
I however am not going to speculate whether it will "suck really really really hard" or not. But rather, I'll patiently wait until people are actually driving and modifying them and proving whether or not they can handle higher boost levels on that aluminum block, and whether or not that handling, acceleration, braking etc has gone down the tubes. Then I'll know.
for the record, I don't think that will be the case. If i had to guess, I think it will be the most impressive performing Evo ever albeit a bit bloated to appeal to a larger market.
What you fail to realize is that time has already told us the new Evo X sucks. Aluminum blocks physically cannot handle more power than iron blocks. Thats actually a hard core FACT. Hmmm...oh wait, heavier cars don't accelerate, corner, or brake as fast as lighter cars...oh wait I think thats a fact too!
Fedja
What you fail to realize is that time has already told us the new Evo X sucks. Aluminum blocks physically cannot handle more power than iron blocks. Thats actually a hard core FACT. Hmmm...oh wait, heavier cars don't accelerate, corner, or brake as fast as lighter cars...oh wait I think thats a fact too!
Man that is a wonderful example of an ignorant response. As has been stated, there are aluminum motors out there already like the the SR20DET that can handle similar boost and power levels as the 4G63.As for the extra weight of the X........ there are already people stripping their interiors etc to lose weight on current evos. Nothing will stop anyone from doing the same with the X and with the extra power and braking it will perform better than lower powered previous gen evos.
oh wait, heavier cars don't accelerate, corner, or brake as fast as lighter cars...oh wait I think thats a fact too!
Go ahead, make the arguement that the SLR has 600 hp. Plenty of Evos out there pushing similar power.
The SR20DET is a full aluminum block and it can withstand about the same amount of power and boost as the 4G63T. As long as Mitsubishi designed the engine properly and overbuilt key areas, an aluminum engine can hold a good amount of power and in the same time it will weigh less than a iron block.
Aluminum blocks are nice in their stock form, they weigh less than iron blocks and can hold stock power levels just fine. Its only when you modify them they tend to distort, twist, crack, and melt.
HEAVIER cars can be made to perform well, but lighter cars can be made to perform BETTER. Take a 3800lb Mclaren and a highly modified lotus Elise, guess which one is going to stop better? I guess no one here appreciates physics?
YES its all speculation for now, but Mitsubishi has declared that the prototype X will be VERY close to what we will see in production. What a sad day for Mitsubishi. R.I.P.
Last edited by sonicnofadz; Feb 5, 2007 at 01:28 PM.
I also would like to see what scientific results you've come up with to support your statments that a "heavier Dodge Caliber" dereived chassis can not be made to handle better then what we have. Even though we know Mitsubishi developed the chassis, licensed a basic version to Chrysler, and continued refining it for their own vehicles. But for a sensationalist like yourself, I'm sure that went waaay over your head.
What a sad day for Mitsubishi. R.I.P.
Last edited by GPTourer; Feb 5, 2007 at 01:54 PM.
You are not talking apples to apples here.. The weight is not as important as how it is used.. For example: Take 2 stock evos. Add a 12 point cage to one. Which one is lighter and which one handles better?






